Oh, please. Expending all the time, effort, and money to do a project, at least try to do it right instead of launching a rock (aka space litter). Someone else working harder can use the opportunity wasted by poor quality work.
Failure is an option to be avoided insofar as possible. Just ask AMSAT developers and builders.
73, art….. W4ART Arlington VA
On 16-Jun-2016, at 10:08 PM, Peter Laws plaws0@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Schultz n8fgv@usa.net wrote:
. 50% of Cubesats are classified as fully or partially successful.
Given that so many are built by people who are *not* *actually* rocket scientists, 50% success seems pretty good. I mean, it's not like there are astronauts on them -- failure can be an option -- but it would be prudent for organizations to keep that 50% thing in mind. Hopefully lessens the disappointment.
-- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Everyone, in some small sacred sanctuary of the self, is nuts. -Leo Rosten, author (1908-1997)