28 Sep
2011
28 Sep
'11
3:23 p.m.
I believe that Simon didn't "open source" the code because it relied heavily on proprietary libraries and resources that he had license to use but no license to publish.
On 09/28/2011 07:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
And what has that to do with Open Source software? Let's assume Simon would've opened the code and other's would've been able to contribute.