[amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite

17 Jan 2012

      So the bomb on board (the pressure bottle for the Nitrogen system) isn't
hazardous?   Try selling that to Manned flight safety folks.....
Alan and Joe are right.
Bob
N4HY
 On Jan 17, 2012 4:22 AM, "Alan P. Biddle" APBIDDLE@united.net wrote:
...
Trevor,
The key part is that it was a manned mission.  The complexity of the safety
paperwork, let alone the mission, jumps because of that.  Pyrotechnics of
any sort are always an issue, but much less when the mission only involves
hardware.
Alan
WA4SCA
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Trevor .
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 10:34 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; rhyolite@nettally.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
--- On Tue, 17/1/12, Joe Leikhim rhyolite@nettally.com wrote:
...
Date: Tuesday, 17 January, 2012, 3:43
Has anyone seen this. I am surprised
a shuttle mission permitted this type of booster. From what
I believed, safety concerns prevented most types of
boosters.
http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1
There are several CubeSats being developed that will carry thrusters, for
example Delfi-n3Xt
http://delfispace.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layo...
id=14&Itemid=18
The safety concerns you mention relate to satellites fitted with
conventional rocket fuel motors.
The Delfi-n3Xt approach uses nitrogen as the propellant and there are other
approaches that would also be safe to fly.
73 Trevor M5AKA

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

[amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite

Robert McGwier

73 Trevor M5AKA