[amsat-bb] Re: NASA's American Student Moon Orbiter...

2 Jul 2008

      what would a sample average link budget be?
Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
...
As far as I can recall we are pursuing both Eagle and the P4 opportunity 
equally, concentrating on common elements until the details are ironed out. 
Neither has been identified as a primary or secondary objective.
I agree a package on a lunar orbiter would be neat, but also that it is not 
the best use of what volunteers we have. We need more folks to step up to do 
things, AND we need to make better use of them when they do.
73, Drew KO4MA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Trevor" m5aka@yahoo.co.uk
To: "AMSAT BB" amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:53 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: NASA's American Student Moon Orbiter...
...
--- On Wed, 2/7/08, Dave hartzell hartzell@gmail.com wrote:
...
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=25839
http://asmo.arc.nasa.gov/
Wouldn't it be fun to have a transponder on this!  ;-)
Fun yes, but dare I say it, a waste of precious Volunteer resources.
All lunar orbits are inherently unstable and will impact after a couple of 
years. The link budget requirements would not attract a mass user base.
I suspect the number of Technically Capable volunteers is already being 
thinly stretched in trying to provide both the primary objective Phase-IV 
Lite (funded by Federal Government dollars) and the secondary objective 
the Eagle HEO.
73 Trevor M5AKA
__________________________________________________________

Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available 
now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

[amsat-bb] Re: NASA's American Student Moon Orbiter...

Joe