On 2021-11-06 19:04, Ashhar Farhan wrote:
> Having worked the qo100 as well as LEOs, I can tell you that the
> elliptical orbit is no substitute for a geostationary sat.
> With qo100 i am on all the time, the antenna points in one direction at
> all times. It is GEO or bust. Get the money and get the GEO. It js worth
> the effort.

Ashhar,

Speaking only for my own interests:

I take the counter-argument; GEO is no substitute for LEO/MEO/HEO.

A GEO provides a static ground footprint and does not have the "chase"
that the other satellite orbits provide. A GEO bird, to me, sounds like
just another repeater-on-the-hill (except in space). No trans-Atlantic
chases or coverage over the poles.

For the price of a GEO ride, AMSAT might be able to get dozens of other
orbital rides spaced over many years. When the GEO bird breaks, that's it.

That said, there are many members in AMSAT who long for a GEO satellite
and I do understand that need. Hopefully, we can get to a fleet that
satisfies everyone.

--- Zach
N0ZGO

-----------------------------------------------------------

Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
Acceptable Use and Privacy Policies available at https://www.amsat.org/about-amsat/

View archives of this mailing list at
https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/amsat-bb@amsat.org
To unsubscribe send an email to amsat-bb-leave(a)amsat.org
Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org