I was just thinking the same thing! (FT-736R w/ 1.2 ghz, and FT-767GX w/ 6m, 2m, and 70cm modules, in my case...)
Greg KO6TH
From: ve4yz@hotmail.com To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:17:27 -0500 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
My 15 year old FT736R with the 1.2 module and my FT847 keep looking better - like a fine wine aging.
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Mik Forsythe Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:22 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
Just left Dayton a few hours ago. Icom said that it is basically a 7600 and a 910. It is bigger than the 910. It was in a display case so I can't tell you what the feel was like of the weight. Price is in the $4,000.00 range so that will kill a lot of the satellite market if you ask me.
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:W...