Sorry. The problem is not really that AMSAT doesn't do enough open source. The problem is that AMSAT seems to be overly constrained in its action. Open Source is part of an overall strategy we suggest for a cure.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020, 3:04 PM Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL) peter@magicbug.co.uk wrote:
Bruce,
I totally get your pro-open source, but it seems to be every email thread, I'd sure hope that AMSAT Engineering was aware of that clause.
Being lots of educational CubeSats use COTS parts, isn't it likely that most would be only open sourcing the ground station elements which might come under "Open Source Software" and be suitable for NASA's guidelines, while AMSAT doesn't to my knowledge release gerber pcb files it does release a good amount of ground station code, think Fox Telem is open source and as others have pointed out there's other projects shared on Github relating to AMSAT satellites.
Peter, 2M0SQL
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 19:15, Bruce Perens via AMSAT-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org wrote:
I am reading a NASA Grant application today, and noticed this text:
Program elements will give preference to proposals that include a plan
for
committing software as Open Source Software (OSS), beginning at the inception of the proposed work. This plan will include the identification of software components developed as part of the proposed work, and designate a permissive, widely accepted OSS license and a public repository hosting service for these components. _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb