4 Feb
2008
4 Feb
'08
12:51 p.m.
The problem is, besides probably being cost prohibitive, you blow your 250mW power budget out of the water with the FPGA. Using Actel's Power Calculator spreadsheet and the specs from the ARM7 IP Core datasheet, you're looking at a worst case of 543 mW with just the core in the 250k gate version and up to a watt in the bigger versions.
That said, thanks for the input. The team needs this kind of input to guide them in their decision processes.
Jonathan Wagner Office: (337)993-0778 Cell: (337)781-1513
Nick Pugh wrote:
Thanks for responce. Would you be willing to get on a web x conference with the team?
nick
----- Original Message ----- *From:* G0MRF@aol.com <mailto:G0MRF@aol.com> *To:* quadpugh@bellsouth.net <mailto:quadpugh@bellsouth.net> ; amsat-bb@amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb@amsat.org> *Cc:* zpan@louisiana.edu <mailto:zpan@louisiana.edu> *Sent:* Sunday, February 03, 2008 5:54 PM *Subject:* Re: [amsat-bb] mentpor help Hello Nick. Alternatively, you may be able to implement the microprocessor functions in radiation tolerent FPGA from Actel. 200 - 300k rads seems to be the limit. http://www.actel.com/products/milaero/rtaxs/default.aspx Thanks David In a message dated 03/02/2008 17:05:24 GMT Standard Time, quadpugh@bellsouth.net <mailto:quadpugh@bellsouth.net> writes: This processor is planed to fly on the CAPE II satellite on 2009. It is anticipated that this will involve two one hour session a month via WEB X. We are seeking those have skill in designing fault tolerant microprocessors and he have knowledge how high energy particles effect memory chips.