<snip>

Hi all & thanks Bernard,

You're welcome.

If you follow up the report in view of the costs and other factors. One of the options for an ATV future was for a use of recovery of debris and satellites. Whilst the cost may be considerably high for such a development, I thought

that it would be very interesting and a positive step forward for study of failure and ageing factors of on board equipment etc. (Batteries ??) Also of course the objective of clearing up and reducing hazards of possible impact or pollution. Wonder on your thoughts on viewing this aspect as a effective application of use of " Space Budgets"

<snip>

Orbital debris has long been of concern and several methods of dealing with it have been proposed in recent years.

Larger objects can, for the most part, be avoided as they are tracked. Some of them are spacecraft that reached the end of their operational lives and could still be useful if they could be refurbished. That could be a possible source of revenue for a salvage firm, provided that those inactive spacecraft could be made safe prior to being brought back. (One space shuttle mission showed this was possible.) Others could be removed from orbit if they were put into, say, a trajectory which would eventually cause them to re-enter and burn up.

Tasks like that could be something that a successor to the ATV might be suited for. Perhaps such a spacecraft could be developed by a private company with backing from a government space agency.

Smaller pieces, such as paint chips, won't be so easy to remove. I remember reading of one proposal that deployed a fine-mesh net which would catch them. Maybe an ATV successor might not be the best spacecraft for that as precise maneuvering probably wouldn't be required.

73s

Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL