I have one of the early ts200x's and I have had no problems on 1.2 ghz.
I mainly us it for the satellites but also use it for the vhf contests and it has always worked fine.
I have consistantly worked many in Ohio on 1.2 ghz with just a M2 at about 30 ft.
I have also heard some others outside of Ohio during band openings (rare but it does happen).;
I don't know where you got this idea that the receive was bad on these rigs.
The radio does have a built in preamp.
I leave it turned OFF for hf because it makes too much noise.
I leave it ON for vhf, and uhf because it does improve the ssb signals.
On 1.2 the preamp is ALWAYS on.
Perry WB8OTH
I want to thank everyone who replied to my questions regarding the TS-2000x. All responses were very helpful. TS-2000x owners seem to be a very satisfied owners.
Tnx & 73's Wayne WA7NE
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Perry Yantis Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:37 AM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] TS-2000X performance on 23cm band - ?
I have one of the early ts200x's and I have had no problems on 1.2 ghz.
I mainly us it for the satellites but also use it for the vhf contests and it has always worked fine.
I have consistantly worked many in Ohio on 1.2 ghz with just a M2 at about 30 ft.
I have also heard some others outside of Ohio during band openings (rare but it does happen).;
I don't know where you got this idea that the receive was bad on these rigs.
The radio does have a built in preamp.
I leave it turned OFF for hf because it makes too much noise.
I leave it ON for vhf, and uhf because it does improve the ssb signals.
On 1.2 the preamp is ALWAYS on.
Perry WB8OTH _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (2)
-
Perry Yantis
-
Wayne Splawn