the original guy I was speaking of was the station the original poster mentioned as not listening on the downlink
John - AG9D
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, John Becker w0jab@big-river.net wrote:
I was the "original guy" and your not even close or warm.
John
At 04:37 PM 5/30/2012, you wrote:
Maybe the other ham the original guy was complaining about was working
SO50
with a dual band/single receive HT himself and was not able to monitor the downlink while he was calling.
John -AG9D
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ben Jackson bbj@innismir.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Ted wrote:
Clint, why on earth would you feel compelled to get in the middle of
another ham's business or posting ?
Another Ham's business... Talking (Complaining) about satellites... On a public mailing list... about... satellites... And we can't comment on
it?
Wait... What?
-- Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA bbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/
______________________________**_________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bb<
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb%3E
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (1)
-
John Spasojevich