Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems to be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
I definitely have to agree with you.
The signal does seem to be less than half of what it used to be, and I have yet to hit it myself. When it used to be so easy.
Not sure what has changed, but it's certainly not the same as it was before the shut down several weeks ago.
Walter/K5WH
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Frank Karnauskas Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems to be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
I have tried two different radios, an Icom IC-2820h and a Kenwood TM-V71A. No luck with the Icom at full power on a high elevation pass. Better luck with the Kenwood but only on higher passes and transmitting with 50w.
Other operators have been able to get their packets digipeated with Kenwood APRS-Ready HTs, so it's kind of puzzling.
I'm using a Mobilinkd TNC3. I have no problem hitting distant terrestrial digipeaters with both setups.
73 Fernando, NP4JV
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 7:37 PM [email protected] wrote:
I definitely have to agree with you.
The signal does seem to be less than half of what it used to be, and I have yet to hit it myself. When it used to be so easy.
Not sure what has changed, but it's certainly not the same as it was before the shut down several weeks ago.
Walter/K5WH
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Frank Karnauskas Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems to be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
It appears that after the system came back after being down for over a month, that something changed. I have been able to hit it with a Kenwood TH-D72, but it was not easy. The receive is a bit deaf, and the transmit is very weak. I tried last evening, but was unsuccessful.
I am wondering if some new antenna systems are being tested. It was a similar situation with the SSTV event over the weekend, then it came back full strength. I am certain that after the testing is complete (if that is what is going on) things will be strong and great again. The A.R.I.S.S. Team is very good and is always working hard with the ISS crew members to keep the systems in tip top shape.
73's de KF6FES
Brian,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 6:46 PM Fernando Ramirez <[email protected] wrote:
I have tried two different radios, an Icom IC-2820h and a Kenwood TM-V71A. No luck with the Icom at full power on a high elevation pass. Better luck with the Kenwood but only on higher passes and transmitting with 50w.
Other operators have been able to get their packets digipeated with Kenwood APRS-Ready HTs, so it's kind of puzzling.
I'm using a Mobilinkd TNC3. I have no problem hitting distant terrestrial digipeaters with both setups.
73 Fernando, NP4JV
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 7:37 PM [email protected] wrote:
I definitely have to agree with you.
The signal does seem to be less than half of what it used to be, and I
have
yet to hit it myself. When it used to be so easy.
Not sure what has changed, but it's certainly not the same as it was
before
the shut down several weeks ago.
Walter/K5WH
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Frank
Karnauskas
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems
to
be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
I'm also having trouble working the ISS packet station, since it's been turned back on. I'm kinda seeing that I can get in better when the ISS is at a certain angle from me. I'm almost sure of this but have been busy elsewhere, so I'm not around for all the passes to be certain. Maybe they'll go back to the good antenna location, if they can...
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Brian Clark Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:54 PM To: Fernando Ramirez [email protected] Cc: AMSAT -BB [email protected] Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
It appears that after the system came back after being down for over a month, that something changed. I have been able to hit it with a Kenwood TH-D72, but it was not easy. The receive is a bit deaf, and the transmit is very weak. I tried last evening, but was unsuccessful.
I am wondering if some new antenna systems are being tested. It was a similar situation with the SSTV event over the weekend, then it came back full strength. I am certain that after the testing is complete (if that is what is going on) things will be strong and great again. The A.R.I.S.S. Team is very good and is always working hard with the ISS crew members to keep the systems in tip top shape.
73's de KF6FES
Brian,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 6:46 PM Fernando Ramirez <[email protected] wrote:
I have tried two different radios, an Icom IC-2820h and a Kenwood TM-V71A. No luck with the Icom at full power on a high elevation pass. Better luck with the Kenwood but only on higher passes and transmitting with 50w.
Other operators have been able to get their packets digipeated with Kenwood APRS-Ready HTs, so it's kind of puzzling.
I'm using a Mobilinkd TNC3. I have no problem hitting distant terrestrial digipeaters with both setups.
73 Fernando, NP4JV
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 7:37 PM [email protected] wrote:
I definitely have to agree with you.
The signal does seem to be less than half of what it used to be, and I
have
yet to hit it myself. When it used to be so easy.
Not sure what has changed, but it's certainly not the same as it was
before
the shut down several weeks ago.
Walter/K5WH
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Frank
Karnauskas
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems
to
be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
APRS is now using a new packet module that is identical in construction to the failed one. The new packet module was just launched to space a few months ago as a backup and just put into operation. We are using the same radio and antenna as before, so any differences people are seeing should be due to the TNC in the packet module.
SSTV was sent using a different radio and antenna, from the other end of ISS. The initial problem with it was completely unrelated to APRS.
Dave, W8AAS
On Feb 13, 2019, at 7:14 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I'm also having trouble working the ISS packet station, since it's been turned back on. I'm kinda seeing that I can get in better when the ISS is at a certain angle from me. I'm almost sure of this but have been busy elsewhere, so I'm not around for all the passes to be certain. Maybe they'll go back to the good antenna location, if they can...
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Brian Clark Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:54 PM To: Fernando Ramirez [email protected] Cc: AMSAT -BB [email protected] Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
It appears that after the system came back after being down for over a month, that something changed. I have been able to hit it with a Kenwood TH-D72, but it was not easy. The receive is a bit deaf, and the transmit is very weak. I tried last evening, but was unsuccessful.
I am wondering if some new antenna systems are being tested. It was a similar situation with the SSTV event over the weekend, then it came back full strength. I am certain that after the testing is complete (if that is what is going on) things will be strong and great again. The A.R.I.S.S. Team is very good and is always working hard with the ISS crew members to keep the systems in tip top shape.
73's de KF6FES
Brian,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 6:46 PM Fernando Ramirez <[email protected] wrote:
I have tried two different radios, an Icom IC-2820h and a Kenwood TM-V71A. No luck with the Icom at full power on a high elevation pass. Better luck with the Kenwood but only on higher passes and transmitting with 50w.
Other operators have been able to get their packets digipeated with Kenwood APRS-Ready HTs, so it's kind of puzzling.
I'm using a Mobilinkd TNC3. I have no problem hitting distant terrestrial digipeaters with both setups.
73 Fernando, NP4JV
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 7:37 PM [email protected] wrote:
I definitely have to agree with you.
The signal does seem to be less than half of what it used to be, and I
have
yet to hit it myself. When it used to be so easy.
Not sure what has changed, but it's certainly not the same as it was
before
the shut down several weeks ago.
Walter/K5WH
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Frank
Karnauskas
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems
to
be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Thank you Dave for the update and clarity!
Brian, KF6FES
On Feb 13, 2019, at 7:20 AM, Dave Taylor [email protected] wrote:
APRS is now using a new packet module that is identical in construction to the failed one. The new packet module was just launched to space a few months ago as a backup and just put into operation. We are using the same radio and antenna as before, so any differences people are seeing should be due to the TNC in the packet module.
SSTV was sent using a different radio and antenna, from the other end of ISS. The initial problem with it was completely unrelated to APRS.
Dave, W8AAS
On Feb 13, 2019, at 7:14 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I'm also having trouble working the ISS packet station, since it's been turned back on. I'm kinda seeing that I can get in better when the ISS is at a certain angle from me. I'm almost sure of this but have been busy elsewhere, so I'm not around for all the passes to be certain. Maybe they'll go back to the good antenna location, if they can...
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Brian Clark Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:54 PM To: Fernando Ramirez [email protected] Cc: AMSAT -BB [email protected] Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
It appears that after the system came back after being down for over a month, that something changed. I have been able to hit it with a Kenwood TH-D72, but it was not easy. The receive is a bit deaf, and the transmit is very weak. I tried last evening, but was unsuccessful.
I am wondering if some new antenna systems are being tested. It was a similar situation with the SSTV event over the weekend, then it came back full strength. I am certain that after the testing is complete (if that is what is going on) things will be strong and great again. The A.R.I.S.S. Team is very good and is always working hard with the ISS crew members to keep the systems in tip top shape.
73's de KF6FES
Brian,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 6:46 PM Fernando Ramirez <[email protected] wrote:
I have tried two different radios, an Icom IC-2820h and a Kenwood TM-V71A. No luck with the Icom at full power on a high elevation pass. Better luck with the Kenwood but only on higher passes and transmitting with 50w.
Other operators have been able to get their packets digipeated with Kenwood APRS-Ready HTs, so it's kind of puzzling.
I'm using a Mobilinkd TNC3. I have no problem hitting distant terrestrial digipeaters with both setups.
73 Fernando, NP4JV
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 7:37 PM [email protected] wrote:
I definitely have to agree with you.
The signal does seem to be less than half of what it used to be, and I
have
yet to hit it myself. When it used to be so easy.
Not sure what has changed, but it's certainly not the same as it was
before
the shut down several weeks ago.
Walter/K5WH
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Frank
Karnauskas
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems
to
be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
For whatever reason the d/l from the ISS packet station is much weaker. I keep missing the passes to research more, but from what I've seen there is not much signal.
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Dave Taylor Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 10:20 AM To: AMSAT -BB [email protected] Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
APRS is now using a new packet module that is identical in construction to the failed one. The new packet module was just launched to space a few months ago as a backup and just put into operation. We are using the same radio and antenna as before, so any differences people are seeing should be due to the TNC in the packet module.
SSTV was sent using a different radio and antenna, from the other end of ISS. The initial problem with it was completely unrelated to APRS.
Dave, W8AAS
On Feb 13, 2019, at 7:14 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I'm also having trouble working the ISS packet station, since it's been turned back on. I'm kinda seeing that I can get in better when the ISS is at a certain angle from me. I'm almost sure of this but have been busy elsewhere, so I'm not around for all the passes to be certain. Maybe they'll go back to the good antenna location, if they
can...
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Brian Clark Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:54 PM To: Fernando Ramirez [email protected] Cc: AMSAT -BB [email protected] Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
It appears that after the system came back after being down for over a month, that something changed. I have been able to hit it with a Kenwood TH-D72, but it was not easy. The receive is a bit deaf, and the transmit is very weak. I tried last evening, but was unsuccessful.
I am wondering if some new antenna systems are being tested. It was a similar situation with the SSTV event over the weekend, then it came back full strength. I am certain that after the testing is complete (if that is what is going on) things will be strong and great again. The
A.R.I.S.S.
Team is very good and is always working hard with the ISS crew members to keep the systems in tip top shape.
73's de KF6FES
Brian,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 6:46 PM Fernando Ramirez <[email protected] wrote:
I have tried two different radios, an Icom IC-2820h and a Kenwood
TM-V71A.
No luck with the Icom at full power on a high elevation pass. Better luck with the Kenwood but only on higher passes and transmitting with
50w.
Other operators have been able to get their packets digipeated with Kenwood APRS-Ready HTs, so it's kind of puzzling.
I'm using a Mobilinkd TNC3. I have no problem hitting distant terrestrial digipeaters with both setups.
73 Fernando, NP4JV
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 7:37 PM [email protected] wrote:
I definitely have to agree with you.
The signal does seem to be less than half of what it used to be, and I
have
yet to hit it myself. When it used to be so easy.
Not sure what has changed, but it's certainly not the same as it was
before
the shut down several weeks ago.
Walter/K5WH
-----Original Message----- From: AMSAT-BB [email protected] On Behalf Of Frank
Karnauskas
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS Signal Quality?
Is it me or does the APRS signal not sound as strong as it was before and is it not hearing quite as well?
I am having a heck of a time pinging the digipeater and the signal seems
to
be down a bit.
Could entirely be something on my end, but I would appreciate others' opinion.
73, Frank
FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW [email protected]
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
official views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (6)
-
Brian Clark -
Dave Taylor -
Fernando Ramirez -
Frank Karnauskas -
kb2mjeff＠att.net -
walterh＠k5wh.net