New Low-cost Launcher For Satellites
http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/07/29/rocket-lab-announces-small-satellite-... http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/gadgets/60372738/kiwi-rocket-company-ready... http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/07/29/kiwi-launches-world-first-chea...
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
It's another company that has yet to demonstrate it can actually achieve successful satellite launches, there must be about half a dozen such companies by now. But I guess there's a good chance some of them may succeed in launching a satellite in the next 5 or so years. The more launch capacity the better.
Getting launches at under $100,000 per kilo is hard which is why even unproven companies can attract interest from sat groups desperate to launch.
They are charging $4.9 million for a 110kg payload into a very low 500 km orbit. That's about $45,000 per kilo.
73 Trevor M5AKA
On 7/29/14, M5AKA m5aka@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
It's another company that has yet to demonstrate it can actually achieve successful satellite launches, there must be about half a dozen such companies by now. But I guess there's a good chance some of them may succeed in launching a satellite in the next 5 or so years. The more launch capacity the better.
Getting launches at under $100,000 per kilo is hard which is why even unproven companies can attract interest from sat groups desperate to launch.
<snip>
I know of one such company. Its booster is several years behind schedule and has yet to fly. Its launch facility has still under construction, as far as I know. However, I also know of someone looking to put a bird into orbit and it appears that this company will put it there for them. From what I understand, the price offered to that client was, relatively speaking, dirt cheap. I guess someone's desperate for business.
Personally, if I was doing something like that, I'd rather pay a higher cost but know that I'm dealing with a launch service that has a proven track record.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
The cost of a launch has been a problem since day one of our space program and will remain a problem until there are many paradigm shifts. But the longer it is business as usual, the cost to orbit a satellite will remain high. Not but a few months ago we were celebrating on the blog so many birds being launched and they were - and they are in orbit (in operational).
For all of us now and for everyone in the past that want to communicate with OSCARs it is a long slow path to routine. But if it was routine we would find ourselves taking OSCAR communications for granted just like 20 meters.
Who on the blog has an idea for cheaper launch and think about HEO too?
How about you BJ?
Rich W4BUE
----- Original Message ----- From: "B J" va6bmj@gmail.com To: "M5AKA" m5aka@yahoo.co.uk Cc: "AMSAT BB" amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 8:51 PM Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New Low-cost Launcher For Satellites
On 7/29/14, M5AKA m5aka@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
It's another company that has yet to demonstrate it can actually achieve successful satellite launches, there must be about half a dozen such companies by now. But I guess there's a good chance some of them may succeed in launching a satellite in the next 5 or so years. The more launch capacity the better.
Getting launches at under $100,000 per kilo is hard which is why even unproven companies can attract interest from sat groups desperate to launch.
<snip>
I know of one such company. Its booster is several years behind schedule and has yet to fly. Its launch facility has still under construction, as far as I know. However, I also know of someone looking to put a bird into orbit and it appears that this company will put it there for them. From what I understand, the price offered to that client was, relatively speaking, dirt cheap. I guess someone's desperate for business.
Personally, if I was doing something like that, I'd rather pay a higher cost but know that I'm dealing with a launch service that has a proven track record.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
On 7/30/14, Rich/wa4bue richard.siff@verizon.net wrote:
The cost of a launch has been a problem since day one of our space program and will remain a problem until there are many paradigm shifts. But the longer it is business as usual, the cost to orbit a satellite will remain high. Not but a few months ago we were celebrating on the blog so many birds being launched and they were - and they are in orbit (in operational).
For all of us now and for everyone in the past that want to communicate with
OSCARs it is a long slow path to routine. But if it was routine we would find ourselves taking OSCAR communications for granted just like 20 meters.
Who on the blog has an idea for cheaper launch and think about HEO too?
<snip>
From what I hear, $50,000 for launching a cubesat into LEO seems to be
the price that people are trying to achieve.
One solution is cheap launchers. There's someone who's working on not just a system but a methodology by which someone can send a payload into orbit very quickly. However, from that I've heard, he's a long way from that goal.
Another is launching several spacecraft at the same time, much like what has been done in recent years. The SHERPA system that was recently announced is one possibility. However, should that malfunction, then all the satellites on board will likely be lost, which is what happened with the KickSat.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
participants (3)
-
B J -
M5AKA -
Rich/wa4bue