Has anyone received a LoTW confirmation for CY9C on Satellite from their 8/2016 DXpedition? I see my QSO in their ClubLog as 2m (it was on AO-7). The only info I've heard was that they were having a N1MM Log issue that didn't upload Sat QSOs correctly. Over 2 months seems like a long time to fix something like that. I'm sure it will be resolved eventually, but I'm holding off with submissions for VUCC and DXCC because of that ONE LoTW QSL. If I submit now, that QSL will certainly show up soon afterward and sit there like an orphan for quite a while until I get others for the next submission. (Murphy's Law!!) TNX/73, Bob K8BL (Life's a Beach, and then you die!!) :o|
All CY9C satellite QSOs were uploaded to LoTW a few days ago, except for the last day of passes worked. Those QSOs have been recovered, formatted for LoTW, and sent to the QSL manager for upload to LoTW.
However, for an unknown reason, some of the QSOs are not matching. I have not been able to find any discrepancies that would explain that. If your QSO(s) did not match, please send me a screenshot of the QSO details page from the LoTW website and I will try to figure it out.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, R.T.Liddy k8bl@ameritech.net wrote:
Has anyone received a LoTW confirmation for CY9C on Satellite from their 8/2016 DXpedition? I see my QSO in their ClubLog as 2m (it was on AO-7). The only info I've heard was that they were having a N1MM Log issue that didn't upload Sat QSOs correctly. Over 2 months seems like a long time to fix something like that. I'm sure it will be resolved eventually, but I'm holding off with submissions for VUCC and DXCC because of that ONE LoTW QSL. If I submit now, that QSL will certainly show up soon afterward and sit there like an orphan for quite a while until I get others for the next submission. (Murphy's Law!!) TNX/73, Bob K8BL (Life's a Beach, and then you die!!) :o|
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Hi all, in my case, I had qso via FO-29, but qso has logged by CY9C operator as 70cm qso. Could that error be of this? Uplink is the band to set for a log, yes?
Regards,
:Jari / OH2FQV
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Paul Stoetzer n8hm@arrl.net wrote:
All CY9C satellite QSOs were uploaded to LoTW a few days ago, except for the last day of passes worked. Those QSOs have been recovered, formatted for LoTW, and sent to the QSL manager for upload to LoTW.
However, for an unknown reason, some of the QSOs are not matching. I have not been able to find any discrepancies that would explain that. If your QSO(s) did not match, please send me a screenshot of the QSO details page from the LoTW website and I will try to figure it out.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, R.T.Liddy k8bl@ameritech.net wrote:
Has anyone received a LoTW confirmation for CY9C on Satellite from their 8/2016 DXpedition? I see my QSO in their ClubLog as 2m (it was on AO-7). The only info I've heard was that they were having a N1MM Log issue that didn't upload Sat QSOs correctly. Over 2 months seems like a long time to fix something like that. I'm sure it will be resolved eventually, but I'm holding off with submissions for VUCC and DXCC because of that ONE LoTW QSL. If I submit now, that QSL will certainly show up soon afterward and sit there like an orphan for quite a while until I get others for the next submission. (Murphy's Law!!) TNX/73, Bob K8BL (Life's a Beach, and then you die!!) :o|
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Hi Paul,
Great job -- I have my LotW QSLs now. Sat stuff always harder and not obvious, sadly.
73, Bob, WB4SON
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Jari A oh2fqv@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, in my case, I had qso via FO-29, but qso has logged by CY9C operator as 70cm qso. Could that error be of this? Uplink is the band to set for a log, yes?
Regards,
:Jari / OH2FQV
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Paul Stoetzer n8hm@arrl.net wrote:
All CY9C satellite QSOs were uploaded to LoTW a few days ago, except for the last day of passes worked. Those QSOs have been recovered, formatted for LoTW, and sent to the QSL manager for upload to LoTW.
However, for an unknown reason, some of the QSOs are not matching. I have not been able to find any discrepancies that would explain that. If your QSO(s) did not match, please send me a screenshot of the QSO details page from the LoTW website and I will try to figure it out.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, R.T.Liddy k8bl@ameritech.net wrote:
Has anyone received a LoTW confirmation for CY9C on Satellite from their 8/2016 DXpedition? I see my QSO in their ClubLog as 2m (it was on AO-7). The only info I've heard was that they were having a N1MM Log issue that didn't upload Sat QSOs correctly. Over 2 months seems like a long time to fix something like that. I'm sure it will be resolved eventually, but I'm holding off with submissions for VUCC and DXCC because of that ONE LoTW QSL. If I submit now, that QSL will certainly show up soon afterward and sit there like an orphan for quite a while until I get others for the next submission. (Murphy's Law!!) TNX/73, Bob K8BL (Life's a Beach, and then you die!!) :o|
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
of
AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Does anyone have a match for a QSO that occurred on August 26th? I may be finding a pattern here...
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Paul Stoetzer n8hm@arrl.net wrote:
All CY9C satellite QSOs were uploaded to LoTW a few days ago, except for the last day of passes worked. Those QSOs have been recovered, formatted for LoTW, and sent to the QSL manager for upload to LoTW.
However, for an unknown reason, some of the QSOs are not matching. I have not been able to find any discrepancies that would explain that. If your QSO(s) did not match, please send me a screenshot of the QSO details page from the LoTW website and I will try to figure it out.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, R.T.Liddy k8bl@ameritech.net wrote:
Has anyone received a LoTW confirmation for CY9C on Satellite from their 8/2016 DXpedition? I see my QSO in their ClubLog as 2m (it was on AO-7). The only info I've heard was that they were having a N1MM Log issue that didn't upload Sat QSOs correctly. Over 2 months seems like a long time to fix something like that. I'm sure it will be resolved eventually, but I'm holding off with submissions for VUCC and DXCC because of that ONE LoTW QSL. If I submit now, that QSL will certainly show up soon afterward and sit there like an orphan for quite a while until I get others for the next submission. (Murphy's Law!!) TNX/73, Bob K8BL (Life's a Beach, and then you die!!) :o|
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
The CY9C satellite log appears to have just been re-uploaded and it looks like the matching errors have been fixed. Passes from the last evening have also been added, so all CY9C satellite QSOs should be in LoTW. If you have a problem, please email me and I will check for any log errors. Any busted call situations will need to go to the QSL manager for his call, though.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Paul Stoetzer n8hm@arrl.net wrote:
Does anyone have a match for a QSO that occurred on August 26th? I may be finding a pattern here...
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Paul Stoetzer n8hm@arrl.net wrote:
All CY9C satellite QSOs were uploaded to LoTW a few days ago, except for the last day of passes worked. Those QSOs have been recovered, formatted for LoTW, and sent to the QSL manager for upload to LoTW.
However, for an unknown reason, some of the QSOs are not matching. I have not been able to find any discrepancies that would explain that. If your QSO(s) did not match, please send me a screenshot of the QSO details page from the LoTW website and I will try to figure it out.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, R.T.Liddy k8bl@ameritech.net wrote:
Has anyone received a LoTW confirmation for CY9C on Satellite from their 8/2016 DXpedition? I see my QSO in their ClubLog as 2m (it was on AO-7). The only info I've heard was that they were having a N1MM Log issue that didn't upload Sat QSOs correctly. Over 2 months seems like a long time to fix something like that. I'm sure it will be resolved eventually, but I'm holding off with submissions for VUCC and DXCC because of that ONE LoTW QSL. If I submit now, that QSL will certainly show up soon afterward and sit there like an orphan for quite a while until I get others for the next submission. (Murphy's Law!!) TNX/73, Bob K8BL (Life's a Beach, and then you die!!) :o|
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (4)
-
Bob -
Jari A -
Paul Stoetzer -
R.T.Liddy