I agree with Howard.
73 John. la2qaa@amsat.org .........................................................................................................
Hi Robert
http://www.wku.edu/ksgc/sats.pdf
This is great stuff and would be a good link (or download) to add to the AMSAT webpage for newbies (like me!)
I agree it is especially clear and well written. My only caveat is that I personally feel that the rejection of full duplex capability in the paper promotes blind transmission for longer periods than necessary creating QRM for others. Thinking back to when I cut my teeth, I would have found it particularly frustrating not knowing if I was making it.
Just my opinion, and the author is to be applauded for his efforts.
73, Howard G6LVB
I also agree with Howard
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message ----- From: "john hackett" la2qaa@hotmail.com To: Amsat-bb@amsat.org Cc: allan_gm1sxx@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 9:46 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Full duplex.
I agree with Howard.
73 John. la2qaa@amsat.org
............................................................................ .............................
Hi Robert
http://www.wku.edu/ksgc/sats.pdf
This is great stuff and would be a good link (or download) to add to the AMSAT webpage for newbies (like me!)
I agree it is especially clear and well written. My only caveat is that I personally feel that the rejection of full duplex capability in the paper promotes blind transmission for longer periods than necessary creating QRM for others. Thinking back to when I cut my teeth, I would have found it particularly frustrating not knowing if I was making it.
Just my opinion, and the author is to be applauded for his efforts.
73, Howard G6LVB
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (2)
-
i8cvs -
john hackett