Re: Where can I buy pre-made feedline?
Nate WY0X wrote:
I've seen N connectors lately that look like PL-259's and have to be soldered on similarly to RG-8 sized coax. I tried one. Pulled on the connector after soldering it together and it had zero strain-relief for the cable being pulled on, and it ripped apart. (Well, the center conductor held on as long as it could). I wouldn't use those for anything.
Wayne W9AE replies:
I've soldered dozens of "two piece" N connectors in the last 10 years. I've NEVER had a connector pull off, but I also haven't tried pulling on the connector with all my strength. The connectors have survived years in the elements, including cables hanging vertically from my mast-mounted preamps, supported only by the connector.
I mostly use flexible 9913 or LMR400UF, and just clip a few strands of the center conductor to get it to fit in the connector. Has anybody measured what kind of degradation that would cause at 450 MHz or 1.2 GHz?
Wayne Estes W9AE Oakland, Oregon, USA, CN83ik
On Dec 7, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Wayne Estes wrote:
Nate WY0X wrote:
I've seen N connectors lately that look like PL-259's and have to be soldered on similarly to RG-8 sized coax. I tried one. Pulled on the connector after soldering it together and it had zero strain-relief for the cable being pulled on, and it ripped apart. (Well, the center conductor held on as long as it could). I wouldn't use those for anything.
Wayne W9AE replies:
I've soldered dozens of "two piece" N connectors in the last 10 years. I've NEVER had a connector pull off, but I also haven't tried pulling on the connector with all my strength. The connectors have survived years in the elements, including cables hanging vertically from my mast-mounted preamps, supported only by the connector.
Understand, Wayne. I suspect that these connectors (from a mystery bin at HRO) weren't that great. Normally I buy only Amphenol.
I also didn't pull with all my strength... the shield was messed up in very little force because the connector wasn't holding the jacket of the RG-8 correctly.
Once it started to let go, I just pulled harder because I knew I wouldn't be using it and went to go find my box with crimp N Amphenol connectors in it. (In other words, if I couldn't get it right the first time and I usually get PL-259's right the first time... I do know how to solder them! -- I wasn't messing with it. Radios are a lot more expensive than connectors, and I knew without a doubt that I could put the crimp N on correctly, having done a whole LOT of them. And not put the rigs at risk with connector problems.)
I mostly use flexible 9913 or LMR400UF, and just clip a few strands of the center conductor to get it to fit in the connector. Has anybody measured what kind of degradation that would cause at 450 MHz or 1.2 GHz?
I've always wondered that too. I need to pick up some of the "UF" LMR400... that stuff looks nice. Have successfully used RG-400 for short jumpers in the past, and it works well with the right connectors on it also, but it's not rated for big power. (I don't have any big power amps anyway.) At 9.6 dB/100' it's not the greatest, but for short flexible jumpers for things that need to move, it's fine.
Have also fiddled with small superflex in repeater installations, works fine for that, but annoyingly stiff for stuff at the house... great if you need really small but kinda "tough" stuff, it's not bad... putting connectors on it is a pain, but someone showed me the trick of using a small pipe cutter to cut the jacket and the tip, which works well if you're patient.
The LMR series of cable surpasses most of these older "types" pretty nicely though, more flexible, longer wearing... yadda yadda. Good stuff.
I think if you get good at putting good quality connectors on, of any type -- anyone can make just about any cable work that's got good loss numbers for anything weak-signal. I keep a roll of bog-standard RG-8 around for just making up "quickie" projects or handing out to friends or whatever, but good quality connectors and cables just make life so much easier in the long run, they're well worth the money spent.
-- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com
participants (2)
-
Nate Duehr
-
Wayne Estes