About the same here. Much better on 6792 than on 7407. My antenna resonates best at 6950 Kc.
Echos s0 to s3 or so, perfectly audible.
73 John K6YK CM97 IC-756 and dipole
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:56:32 -0500 "James" [email protected] writes:
5:10 - 5:25 UTC
6.7925 CW
The HAARP transmitter s5 - s7
Echo s0 to s5
Kenwood TS-440s G5RV Antenna @ 30ft Lavonia, Georgia Grid EM84km
73!
James KB7TBT www.kb7tbt.com
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Did anybody record a .wav or .mp3 file of this experiement. If so, I think many would like to hear it. Especially those who weren't able to take a listen.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
----- Original Message ----- From: "John W Lee" [email protected] To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 10:13 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: echo
About the same here. Much better on 6792 than on 7407. My antenna resonates best at 6950 Kc.
Echos s0 to s3 or so, perfectly audible.
73 John K6YK CM97 IC-756 and dipole
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:56:32 -0500 "James" [email protected] writes:
5:10 - 5:25 UTC
6.7925 CW
The HAARP transmitter s5 - s7
Echo s0 to s5
Kenwood TS-440s G5RV Antenna @ 30ft Lavonia, Georgia Grid EM84km
73!
James KB7TBT www.kb7tbt.com
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
On 20 Jan 2008 at 1:14, Jeff Yanko wrote:
Did anybody record a .wav or .mp3 file of this experiement. If so, I think many would like to hear it. Especially those who weren't able to take a listen.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
It is 0436 am and i recorded about 5 meg near an hour of only one signal on 7.4075mhz. I will have to listen the whole recordings and recheck them with spectran to see if this signal was coming directly from the Moon or from the HAARP site in Alaska?
I barely guess the signal on 6.7925 Mhz but on 7.4075mhz spectran measure a noise floor at +_ -50db and the signal was around -30 db and curiously without the fast fading present on the other broadcast stations around.
I don't believe an echoed signal from the moon can return back through the ionosphere when the propagation seems to be rock solid at that time on a very near 40 meter band frequency!
But the experts will probably give their own opinions? And for those who can get an 1.8 meg .WAV file on their mail server box, i can send you a short piece of my recordings
Luc Leblanc VE2DWE Skype VE2DWE www.qsl.net/ve2dwe WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
I missed Saturday morning's transmissions but managed to record both hours this Sunday morning. Like Luc I could only barely make out a signal on 6.7925 but heard the signal on 7.4075 MHz more as continuous signal. By my ear I could not distinguish between a ground wave and the moon reflected wave, if there was one. I recorded the listening sessions using HRD and used a 10-Mb file size limit and I went to bed around 15-minutes into the 7.4075 transmission. My setup is modest; an FT-817; ~100-ft RG-213/U to a Butternut vertical. There was considerable noise ranging from S5 to S9.
Kevin N3HKQ
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luc Leblanc Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 4:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: echo
On 20 Jan 2008 at 1:14, Jeff Yanko wrote:
Did anybody record a .wav or .mp3 file of this experiement. If so, I
think
many would like to hear it. Especially those who weren't able to take a listen.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
It is 0436 am and i recorded about 5 meg near an hour of only one signal on 7.4075mhz. I will have to listen the whole recordings and recheck them with spectran to see if this signal was coming directly from the Moon or from the
HAARP site in Alaska?
I barely guess the signal on 6.7925 Mhz but on 7.4075mhz spectran measure a noise floor at +_ -50db and the signal was around -30 db and curiously without the fast fading present on the other broadcast stations around.
I don't believe an echoed signal from the moon can return back through the ionosphere when the propagation seems to be rock solid at that time on a very near 40 meter band frequency!
But the experts will probably give their own opinions? And for those who can get an 1.8 meg .WAV file on their mail server box, i can send you a short piece of my recordings
Luc Leblanc VE2DWE Skype VE2DWE www.qsl.net/ve2dwe WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
_______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
I didn't record any audio but did make 73 screen captures of Spectran display of the signal. You can get more info at http://www.kl7uw.com/raseti.htm the images are http://www.kl7uw.com/img0001.jpg thru http://www.kl7uw.com/img0073.jpg
73 Ed
At 12:14 AM 1/20/2008, Jeff Yanko wrote:
Did anybody record a .wav or .mp3 file of this experiement. If so, I think many would like to hear it. Especially those who weren't able to take a listen.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
----- Original Message ----- From: "John W Lee" [email protected] To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 10:13 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: echo
About the same here. Much better on 6792 than on 7407. My antenna resonates best at 6950 Kc.
Echos s0 to s3 or so, perfectly audible.
73 John K6YK CM97 IC-756 and dipole
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:56:32 -0500 "James" [email protected] writes:
5:10 - 5:25 UTC
6.7925 CW
The HAARP transmitter s5 - s7
Echo s0 to s5
Kenwood TS-440s G5RV Antenna @ 30ft Lavonia, Georgia Grid EM84km
73!
James KB7TBT www.kb7tbt.com
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
73, Ed - KL7UW ====================================== BP40IQ 50-MHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com 144-EME: FT-847, mgf-1801, 4x-xpol-20, 185w DUBUS Magazine USA Rep [email protected] ======================================
MAJOR OMISSION
I missed to added that the signal was going more and more weaker at the same rate as the moon was going down on the horizon. The last 30 minutes where only decoded by spectran and is it possible the propagation was doing the same?? Big mystery??
DIRECTION THE BED...
Luc Leblanc VE2DWE Skype VE2DWE www.qsl.net/ve2dwe WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
----- Original Message ----- From: "Luc Leblanc" [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 10:56 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: echo Major omission
MAJOR OMISSION
I missed to added that the signal was going more and more weaker at the
same
rate as the moon was going down on the horizon. The last 30 minutes where
only
decoded by spectran and is it possible the propagation was doing the
same?? Big
mystery??
DIRECTION THE BED...
Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
Hi Luc, VE3DWE
Very interesting observation because at 432 MHz EME it is a completely different story and normally the reflected signal becomes stronger with very low elevation of the moon due of the effect called " gain of the ground" .
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
participants (6)
-
Edward Cole -
i8cvs -
Jeff Yanko -
John W Lee -
Kevin J. Smith -
Luc Leblanc