While I was getting ready to activate a NO-84 Station here. I noticed my computer logging program had a small glitch with trying to log a contact on this bird.
we got it semi worked out, it was the designator for the mode. ya know like Mode "A" or mode "J" etc.
The program writer has many, but it did not have what this NO-84 is running and from what I see here,
Designator *H*
*A*
*V*
*U*
*L*
*S*
*S2*
*C*
*X*
*K*
*R*
Band 15 m https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_meters 10 m https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_meters 2 m https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_meters 70 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/70_centimeters 23 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23_centimeters 13 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_centimeters 9 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9_centimeters 5 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_centimeters 3 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_centimeters 1.2 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1.2_centimeters 6 mm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6_millimeters Frequency (General) 21 MHz 29 MHz 145 MHz 435 MHz 1.2 GHz 2.4 GHz 3.4 GHz 5 GHz 10 GHz 24 GHz 47 GHz
I'm guessing it would be mode "AU"?
Now he was asking for a as complete list as possible of all modes that are possible, can anyone tell me what to tell him? he wants to add them all to his software.
Joe WB9SBD
wow sorry guys that all got broken up by the e mail list, I was referring to the chart on the wiki page, that lists the letters for the modes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio_satellite
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:00 AM, Joe wrote:
While I was getting ready to activate a NO-84 Station here. I noticed my computer logging program had a small glitch with trying to log a contact on this bird.
we got it semi worked out, it was the designator for the mode. ya know like Mode "A" or mode "J" etc.
The program writer has many, but it did not have what this NO-84 is running and from what I see here,
Designator *H*
*A*
*V*
*U*
*L*
*S*
*S2*
*C*
*X*
*K*
*R*
Band 15 m https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_meters 10 m https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_meters 2 m https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_meters 70 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/70_centimeters 23 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23_centimeters 13 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_centimeters 9 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9_centimeters 5 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_centimeters 3 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_centimeters 1.2 cm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1.2_centimeters 6 mm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6_millimeters Frequency (General) 21 MHz 29 MHz 145 MHz 435 MHz 1.2 GHz 2.4 GHz 3.4 GHz 5 GHz 10 GHz 24 GHz 47 GHz
I'm guessing it would be mode "AU"?
Now he was asking for a as complete list as possible of all modes that are possible, can anyone tell me what to tell him? he wants to add them all to his software.
Joe WB9SBD
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe search the BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7
How'd I Miss that?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe search the BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH kb1pvh@gmail.com wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe search the BB archives.
Unfortunately, there was no consensus. Factions were evenly split between "we must do exactly as we did 30-40 years ago", "who cares, do whatever you want", and "can we not bring some order to this science and engineering hobby?"
Personally, I'm in favor of the "new scheme" that AMSAT came up with, I believe for AO-40, with a letter for each band in the form of Z/y, where Z is the uplink and y is the downlink. The laminated sheets sold by AMSAT at Dayton and other places uses this consistently. Unfortunately, adherence to the 10+ year old "new" way of denoting modes is only supported half-heartedly by AMSAT itself.
Wow, Found it,
http://www.amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2016-July/059392.html
And Wow, Now I have no idea as to what to tell this poor program developer guy!
He wants to make it as useful to us Sat users as possible.
But wow, Now what?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe search the BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Perhaps tell him with some clever programming, perhaps he can provide the "one ring to bind them" all ? If there is no concensus, then the logger could just take the different formats and provide the user (you) a way to designate any valid method? Frankly, speaking for myself as "newer" to hamsats, I do not find the Mode, nor AMSAT Z/y designator particularly useful. No other splits, or methods, across ham radio use such designators. I think Bob B's suggestion of using Frequency the best going forward, even though there was no concensus. Rob KA2CZU
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 10:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
Wow, Found it,
http://www.amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2016-July/059392.html
And Wow, Now I have no idea as to what to tell this poor program developer guy!
He wants to make it as useful to us Sat users as possible.
But wow, Now what?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe search the BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
I also like the frequency thing except, HZ? KHZ? MHZ? GHZ?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:48 AM, Robert Switzer wrote:
Perhaps tell him with some clever programming, perhaps he can provide the "one ring to bind them" all ?
If there is no concensus, then the logger could just take the different formats and provide the user (you) a way to designate any valid method?
Frankly, speaking for myself as "newer" to hamsats, I do not find the Mode, nor AMSAT Z/y designator particularly useful. No other splits, or methods, across ham radio use such designators. I think Bob B's suggestion of using Frequency the best going forward, even though there was no concensus.
Rob KA2CZU
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 10:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
Wow, Found it,
http://www.amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2016-July/059392.html
And Wow, Now I have no idea as to what to tell this poor program developer guy!
He wants to make it as useful to us Sat users as possible.
But wow, Now what?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com/ On 8/4/2016 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe
search the
BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA
makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Pick MHz if you have to, but again, it's a simple form change to specify. Really, we are not programming in assembly language any longer. Rob KA2CZU
Show original message On Thursday, August 4, 2016 11:05 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
I also like the frequency thing except, HZ? KHZ? MHZ? GHZ?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:48 AM, Robert Switzer wrote:
Perhaps tell him with some clever programming, perhaps he can provide the "one ring to bind them" all ?
If there is no concensus, then the logger could just take the different formats and provide the user (you) a way to designate any valid method?
Frankly, speaking for myself as "newer" to hamsats, I do not find the Mode, nor AMSAT Z/y designator particularly useful. No other splits, or methods, across ham radio use such designators. I think Bob B's suggestion of using Frequency the best going forward, even though there was no concensus.
Rob KA2CZU
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 10:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
Wow, Found it,
http://www.amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2016-July/059392.html
And Wow, Now I have no idea as to what to tell this poor program developer guy!
He wants to make it as useful to us Sat users as possible.
But wow, Now what?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com/ On 8/4/2016 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe
search the
BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA
makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
I also like the frequency thing except, HZ? KHZ? MHZ? GHZ?
The ADIF standard is MHz. Bands are defined with MHz limits. How a program (or LOTW) displays those frequencies is up to those programs. You'll find that the DXLab Suite adheres very closely to the ADIF and with good reason if you see who is a main driver behind the latter. :-)
SAT_MODE and SAT_NAME are both strings, not enumerated variables, so it's up to the software author to put something there that makes sense.
This is what AA6YQ is trying to do but, sadly, AMSAT doesn't have a standard it's willing to stick with.
"AMSAT doesn't have a standard it's willing to stick with."
As I've said many times, we do have a standard. We've had the same standard for nearly 20 years. It's reflected on the website and in AMSAT publications.
Many of us choose to use the old mode designations out of tradition, especially when operating on AO-7 (which, literally does have Modes A and B) and I like the single letter mode descriptions out of simplicity.
Software developers that want to provide a field for the satellite mode designator should permit the use of single letter designators (which include the old hybrid single letter designators, like AJ, plus JA and JD for analog vs. digital) as well as the dual letter designators.
Dual letter designators are easy, but only go up to 47 GHz. Permit the use of any of these letters as the up or downlink as appropriate for the satellite:
H A V U L S S2 C X K R
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Peter Laws plaws0@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
I also like the frequency thing except, HZ? KHZ? MHZ? GHZ?
The ADIF standard is MHz. Bands are defined with MHz limits. How a program (or LOTW) displays those frequencies is up to those programs. You'll find that the DXLab Suite adheres very closely to the ADIF and with good reason if you see who is a main driver behind the latter. :-)
SAT_MODE and SAT_NAME are both strings, not enumerated variables, so it's up to the software author to put something there that makes sense.
This is what AA6YQ is trying to do but, sadly, AMSAT doesn't have a standard it's willing to stick with.
-- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Almost all of them are already in DXLab. Very little needs to be added.
It's not really a necessary field (since you already have the RX and TX band fields), so maybe AU should be added for NO-84, PSAT-2, and any past and future PSK transponders, but most are already covered in the software.
I think CX is already in there for the future AMSAT "five and dime" projects, but if it's not, it should be added. If SX isn't in there yet, it should be added for Phase 4A (I'm at work without DXlab installed, so I can't check the existing list).
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
Wow, Found it,
http://www.amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2016-July/059392.html
And Wow, Now I have no idea as to what to tell this poor program developer guy!
He wants to make it as useful to us Sat users as possible.
But wow, Now what?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe search the BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Hi Paul, Yeah adding it ( if needed was easy with the SAT list) too bad Dave doesn't have a also easily edited list for the modes so we can just do the work for him ya know?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:52 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
Almost all of them are already in DXLab. Very little needs to be added.
It's not really a necessary field (since you already have the RX and TX band fields), so maybe AU should be added for NO-84, PSAT-2, and any past and future PSK transponders, but most are already covered in the software.
I think CX is already in there for the future AMSAT "five and dime" projects, but if it's not, it should be added. If SX isn't in there yet, it should be added for Phase 4A (I'm at work without DXlab installed, so I can't check the existing list).
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
Wow, Found it,
http://www.amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2016-July/059392.html
And Wow, Now I have no idea as to what to tell this poor program developer guy!
He wants to make it as useful to us Sat users as possible.
But wow, Now what?
Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 8/4/2016 9:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
Joe,
There was a big discussion about this a couple weeks ago, maybe search the BB archives.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
But wow, Now what?
AMSAT, at some level, needs to get on the stick, make a decision, stick with it, then clean up the website to reflect that decision. If this were the ARRL, I'd harangue my Division Director about it and maybe, if I was lucky, something would happen (I've actually seen that happen once!). I've not paid enough attention to AMSAT in the past to know how to do that here and I've only been a member since Dayton.
As it is, you can pick your designators. You can choose 1994 (http://www.amsat.org/amsat/intro/sats_faq.html) or 1998 (ftp://ftp.amsat.org/amsat/press-releases/p3dfact2.pdf) and point to definitive documentation at AMSAT's own site. I bet if you googled a little harder, you could come up with others, even.
I've offered in the past to help clean up crufty old stuff on the site before and I make the same offer again. At the very least, the cruft needs to be marked as cruft with links to current documentation.
The official AMSAT mode designations are the modern versions that were created for the Phase 3D project (which through out the old mode system because of the matrix design that allowed any transmitter to linked to any receiver). The current version of the website as well as AMSAT publications (such as the Getting Started guide) reflect the modern AMSAT mode designations (though often with the old designations in parentheticals).
The sites you have listed are not part of the current AMSAT website. They are retained on the server solely as historical material. Please contact Joe Fitzgerald, KM1P, if you would like to help mark and organize the AMSAT website archives. We are extremely short of volunteers to help maintain and create content for the website and would be grateful for any assistance that could be provided.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Peter Laws plaws0@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
But wow, Now what?
AMSAT, at some level, needs to get on the stick, make a decision, stick with it, then clean up the website to reflect that decision. If this were the ARRL, I'd harangue my Division Director about it and maybe, if I was lucky, something would happen (I've actually seen that happen once!). I've not paid enough attention to AMSAT in the past to know how to do that here and I've only been a member since Dayton.
As it is, you can pick your designators. You can choose 1994 (http://www.amsat.org/amsat/intro/sats_faq.html) or 1998 (ftp://ftp.amsat.org/amsat/press-releases/p3dfact2.pdf) and point to definitive documentation at AMSAT's own site. I bet if you googled a little harder, you could come up with others, even.
I've offered in the past to help clean up crufty old stuff on the site before and I make the same offer again. At the very least, the cruft needs to be marked as cruft with links to current documentation.
-- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
I will note this excellent write up on logging satellite QSOs on Logbook of the World. N5JB boils it down to exactly what’s needed for LoTW confirmations.
https://lotw.arrl.org/lotw-help/satellite-qsos/
FYI.
Jim Wilson, K5ND
On Aug 4, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Paul Stoetzer n8hm@arrl.net wrote:
The official AMSAT mode designations are the modern versions that were created for the Phase 3D project (which through out the old mode system because of the matrix design that allowed any transmitter to linked to any receiver). The current version of the website as well as AMSAT publications (such as the Getting Started guide) reflect the modern AMSAT mode designations (though often with the old designations in parentheticals).
The sites you have listed are not part of the current AMSAT website. They are retained on the server solely as historical material. Please contact Joe Fitzgerald, KM1P, if you would like to help mark and organize the AMSAT website archives. We are extremely short of volunteers to help maintain and create content for the website and would be grateful for any assistance that could be provided.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Peter Laws plaws0@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe nss@mwt.net wrote:
But wow, Now what?
AMSAT, at some level, needs to get on the stick, make a decision, stick with it, then clean up the website to reflect that decision. If this were the ARRL, I'd harangue my Division Director about it and maybe, if I was lucky, something would happen (I've actually seen that happen once!). I've not paid enough attention to AMSAT in the past to know how to do that here and I've only been a member since Dayton.
As it is, you can pick your designators. You can choose 1994 (http://www.amsat.org/amsat/intro/sats_faq.html) or 1998 (ftp://ftp.amsat.org/amsat/press-releases/p3dfact2.pdf) and point to definitive documentation at AMSAT's own site. I bet if you googled a little harder, you could come up with others, even.
I've offered in the past to help clean up crufty old stuff on the site before and I make the same offer again. At the very least, the cruft needs to be marked as cruft with links to current documentation.
-- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Paul Stoetzer n8hm@arrl.net wrote:
Please contact Joe Fitzgerald, KM1P, if you would like to help mark and organize the AMSAT website archives. We are extremely short of volunteers to help maintain and create content for the website and would be grateful for any assistance that could be provided.
I'll assume that he's the Joe CC'd. Joe - let me know how I can help.
participants (6)
-
Dave Webb KB1PVH -
Jim Wilson -
Joe -
Paul Stoetzer -
Peter Laws -
Robert Switzer