The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's for emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago. At least it would appear the issue is larger than just AMSAT-NA
Joe K0VTY ================== On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:09:41 -0500 "Roger Kolakowski" rogerkola@aol.com writes:
I actually equate the preparation and package to being a combination of the previous efforts of Civil Defense and MARS (not the planet.)
During the Cold War the government funded the placement of 2 meter Gonset Communicators in many CD Shelters and city/town communication facilities around the country. Nets were held. Groups were formed.
Currently I do know that, at least in Massachusetts, there is still funding available to the towns for a "Civil Defense" director in the local governments.
So...as part of the EMCOMM..."Civil Defense" services are again strengthened through a local "Communications Officer", the old lessons of traffic passing are updated and practiced ala "MARS" TYPE traffic nets (though not under Military oversight), new "standards" are set, satellite "nets" are formed for readiness training allowing the development of "systems" and as usual "emergency traffic" gets priority.
This may preclude 100% access by the casual operator during "net" evenings, but assuming timezone differences and a sufficiently wide passband, these "CD" nets might be held one day/night per week.
In this case, we prove and provide capability, develop a "league" of operators who can become EMCOMM qualified while allowing themselves and others to use the satellite "freetime" while developing their skills at disaster relief if they so choose.
Previously these activities came under the "umbrella" of the ARRL. That would be one solution, however there is a real possibility that this becomes an opportunity for AMSAT to step up and drag EMCOMM kicking and screaming into this century.
Will it require more of an organization, yes...will it require more "members"...yes, but the opportunities for digital to pencil traffic handling and communications are endless.
Roger WA1KAT
----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Cole" kl7uw@acsalaska.net To: brobertson@mta.ca; amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 10:30 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: The Whole GEO Package
At 04:29 AM 12/20/2007, Bruce Robertson wrote:
In this spirit, might I ask this list to imagine what needs to be
done to
make the emcomm/geo package a reality? The following is my rather
long
analysis of the situation.
I believe the proponents of the Intelsat agreement have done us a
great
service by identifying a real and persisting need which AMSAT
can uniquely
fulfill. By doing so, they not only greatly increase our chances
of funding
otherwise prohibitively expensive launches, they give our branch
of the
hobby a greater reason to do what we do.
However, I also think the EMCOMM branch of our hobby has
different needs
than the usual satellite station operator. If we are to really
and honestly
make the world a safer place and save lives, I think we will need
to
provide a GEO EMCOMM package that will require us as a
organization to
branch into some new and exciting efforts. Let me explain what I
mean.
Traditionally, a satellite station has been developed through
one person's
expertise gradually growing regarding a number of interrelated
aspects: low
signal VHF and UHF operation; the mechanics of an az-el antenna
array;
computer control; and doppler correction. Certain satellites or
operating
habits allow one to omit one or more of these, but in general
it's, even by
ham standards, a challenging array of new skills and
understanding. I'd say
the members of AMSAT are self-selected as those who enjoy this
challenge
and seek to learn as many aspects of the field as possible.
However, for an EMCOMM system to be effective, it cannot rely on
a broad
array of such specialized knowledge: it is unreasonable to expect
that the
first ham on the scene of a disaster will be one of the AMSAT
'us', a
person who has acquired this specialized knowledge. It is only
reasonable
to assume that it will be an amateur radio operator, familiar
with the
general principles of radio theory and operation. In fact, in my
region t he
EMCOMM specialists and the technical specialists (if I might put
it that
way) are often not the same people.
So our challenge is more extensive than the challenge that faced
AMSAT with
any previous launch: we need to make communication through this
bird
possible for any ham shmoe who is opening up a box of equipment
after, say
an afternoon of instruction half a year ago. Please note, this
is not a
matter of dumbing-down the bird or making it uninteresting. In
fact, for
the old-hands and the technically adept around here this will be
very
interesting and a great outlet for our skills. In this
application, if not
on all birds, we should take it as a sign of success when people effortlessly get connected, because it would mean that, in a
true emergency
there would be a greater likelihood of useful service.
If this analysis is accurate, we need to imagine, broadly, three
things: a)
the services (or modes) this ham will offer to support EMCOMM; b)
the box
of stuff that this ham opens up; c) the afternoon's training she
undertook
to know how to use it. These are interrelated, of course. The
training is
apropos the box of stuff, and the box of stuff allows the
services. They
should also, I think, be *standardized* to an extent that has not
been the
case before with satellite work. Recently I heard the argument on
Amateur
Radio Newsline that ham EMCOMM services should be more
interchangeable
across the continent; the same will surely be the case regarding
this work.
Ideally the 'stuff' and the training is the same everywhere so
that the
shmoe has a chance of recollecting her training and is required
to factor
out/in as few local variables as possible.
The advantage we have is that it isn't unreasonable to expect the
box of
stuff to be perhaps more pricey than individual hams would like
such things
to be.
A large part of a) and b) will be determined by the ACP team,
whose goal
even with Eagle was to provide ground-station hardware alongside
the bird's
hardware. (The wisdom of this new approach should be applauded;
I'm sure it
has made re-purposing Eagle hardware for P4/EMCOMM much easier
to imagine.)
As I've argued before, I think one of the most important mode we
can offer
is simple Internet connectivity, allowing the emergency services
folks to
use the communication tools like email with which they are most
familiar. I
hope this will be part of the mix. As for the second half of b)
and c), I
think it will focus around designing and teaching the use of
software.
Perhaps the box of stuff will include a laptop that operates well
with a
specialized linux distribution-on-a-disk, including all the
software tools
needed to assess link quality, perform simple communication, etc.
If I'm
right, this is fortunate because we seem to have quite a number
of adept
software developers in our midst.
Finally, the course. Can we provide standard lesson-plans, ppt
slides and
the like? I think this would significantly lower the bar on each
of us
teaching a session on P4 to our local club or EMCOMM group.
I think we should spread the load on these tasks as early as
possible,
making many of us participants in the final goal of increasing
the safety
of our communities and nations. I'm excited to hear what others
think about
the broader implications of the P4 initiative and how we can
deliver on the
whole GEO package.
73, Bruce VE9QRP
Bruce,
This is an excellent topic to bring to the -bb.
Off course until the design of P4 has progressed, this is mostly
speculation.
The EMCOMM radio package will most certainly drive the satellite requirements, as well.
The ground package needs to be: 1- compact (portable) 2- standardized (so diverse groups can assemble a package) 3- well documented (both for assembly and use) 4- versatile to power (anywhere in the world) 5- robust (to endure rough handling; harsh environments) 6- easy to interface (with computing hdwr; telco; other ham
equipment)
7- simple to assemble and aim 8- affordable 9- kit or ready to use (within reason considering the technology)
This should probably be close to the same package that the
apartment
user will have. This would expand the volume of units made.
design
be made available to commercial sector to provide units (fitting
the spec).
Hope this gives a starting point.
73, Ed - KL7UW ====================================== BP40IQ 50-MHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com 144-EME: FT-847, mgf-1801, 4x-xpol-20, 185w DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubususa@hotmail.com ======================================
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Joe noted...
"...> The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's for emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago....<
Please don't misinterpret me...It has been mentioned many times that ARRL does not necessarily have Satellite interests as one of their primary objectives.
The status of contesting through satellites is one example.
I mentioned ARRL only in recognition of past efforts and accomplishments in supporting EMCOMM...a decision would have to be made as to whether they have expertise or influence remaining in that area, other than an existing large organization of amateur radio operators. Do we as AMSAT need to generate that pool of talent or do we choose to "borrow" from it to meet satellite EMCOMM goals?
Roger WA1KAT
----- Original Message ----- From: k0vty@juno.com To: rogerkola@aol.com Cc: brobertson@mta.ca; amsat-bb@amsat.org; kl7uw@acsalaska.net Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:58 PM Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: The Whole GEO Package - EMCOMM
The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's for emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago. At least it would appear the issue is larger than just AMSAT-NA
Joe K0VTY
At 05:35 AM 12/21/2007, Roger Kolakowski wrote:
expertise or influence remaining in that area, other than an existing large organization of amateur radio operators. Do we as AMSAT need to generate that pool of talent or do we choose to "borrow" from it to meet satellite EMCOMM goals?
I'd say "both" here. There will be a lot of EMCOMM and technical talent outside AMSAT's current scope that could be brought in, and obviously, AMSAT can provide the satellite knowledge to the broader EMCOMM community. In the end, everyone gains. :)
73 de VK3JED http://vkradio.com
The initial test of New York States new $2 Billion Emergency Comms system illustrates well why the EMCOMM facility that Phase-4 could provide is much needed.
NY Emergency Comms System http://www.southgatearc.org/news/december2007/ny_fails_first_major_test.htm
A Happy Christmas and a Healthy and Prosperous New Year to you all.
73 Trevor M5AKA --------------- Daily Amateur Radio RSS News: http://www.southgatearc.org/ Email your news items to: editor at southgatearc.org
News On Your Website: http://www.southgatearc.org/rss/index.htm News On Your PC: http://www.southgatearc.org/rss/newsreader.htm Upload Your News: http://www.southgatearc.org/news/your_news.htm ---------------
__________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
I am having trouble tracking the Doppler shift on VO-52 and wondering if I am tracking backwards on the Doppler as it seems the frequencies seem to diverge as I am operating. I am using the recent version of SatPC32 and this is my Doppler.sqf entry, is this what others are using?
VO-52,145900.29, 435250.57,USB,LSB,REV,0,0
Michael K3MH
Michael,
I have almost exactly the same transponder constant you do. If what you posted is a direct copy, you might take out the spaces for the 70 cm frequency. Extra characters can cause odd things.
Some other things which can cause divergence are old keps, an incorrect QTH position, or a drifting rig. MY FT-847 used to do that until I stabilize the xtal temperatures.
73s,
Alan WA4SCA
At 04:58 AM 12/21/2007, k0vty@juno.com wrote:
The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's for emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago. At least it would appear the issue is larger than just AMSAT-NA
Umm, it's also larger than the ARRL guys, this is sounding more like something for the IARU level...
73 de VK3JED http://vkradio.com
participants (6)
-
Alan P. Biddle
-
k0vty@juno.com
-
Michael Hatzakis Jr MD
-
Roger Kolakowski
-
Tony Langdon
-
Trevor