Would you have to go up on 435.23 to get the vo-52 145.92 downlink?
Tom Williams 703 402 0869
On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:25, "Alan Sieg WB5RMG" wb5rmg@somenet.net wrote:
I may be reading things wrong, but it appears that this next pass for VO-52 and FO-29 might offer cross-satellite contact...
Check me. VO-52 uplink 435.270 -> downlink 145.920 AO-29 uplink 145.920 -> downlink 435.820 I might be a fool .
I haven't studied this but a few minutes, but it might just be. Wish I was better prepared to try something. Maybe I'll get on VO-52 at 435.270, and someone else can listen for me on 435.820 ... or thereabouts
/;^)
Would you have to go up on 435.23 to get the vo-52 145.92 downlink? Tom Williams
On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:25, "Alan Sieg WB5RMG" wb5rmg@somenet.net wrote:
I may be reading things wrong, but it appears that this next pass for VO-52 and FO-29 might offer cross-satellite contact...
Check me. VO-52 uplink 435.270 -> downlink 145.920 AO-29 uplink 145.920 -> downlink 435.820 I might be a fool .
I might have been close... You were right Tom.. Thanks ! I went up on 435.230 LSB, and heard myself on 145.913 USB, ( and worked WB9YIG EM67 !) I tried listening around 435.88x - and heard myself, but not via FO-29. - I had too much adjacent antenna interference. That don't count.
Maybe I can be better prepared next time. Thanks /;^)
participants (2)
-
Alan Sieg WB5RMG -
Tom Williams