Hi All,
New TLEs have been released by CSpOC, and currently we are looking at object 2018-099AV / 43801 for JY1Sat. Very close are also objects AX and AY, but the coming passes will show which one may produce a good fit.
*note* the objects have not yet been assigned, so AV is still our best estimate. More observations are needed to confirm or amend.
73
Wouter PA3WEG
Wouter,
With the new TLEs available I find that the best fit for JO 97 is now object 43803. But separation from object 43801 is only 2 s.
73, Nico
On 11-12-18 17:42, Wouter Weggelaar wrote:
Hi All,
New TLEs have been released by CSpOC, and currently we are looking at object 2018-099AV / 43801 for JY1Sat. Very close are also objects AX and AY, but the coming passes will show which one may produce a good fit.
*note* the objects have not yet been assigned, so AV is still our best estimate. More observations are needed to confirm or amend.
73
Wouter PA3WEG _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
This is indeed also what we find now after more precise observations. I have also informed CSpOC of this, and I would encourage everyone to use 43803 / 2018-099AX
Wouter PA3WEG On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:41 PM Nico Janssen hamsat@xs4all.nl wrote:
Wouter,
With the new TLEs available I find that the best fit for JO 97 is now object 43803. But separation from object 43801 is only 2 s.
73, Nico
On 11-12-18 17:42, Wouter Weggelaar wrote:
Hi All,
New TLEs have been released by CSpOC, and currently we are looking at object 2018-099AV / 43801 for JY1Sat. Very close are also objects AX and AY, but the coming passes will show which one may produce a good fit.
*note* the objects have not yet been assigned, so AV is still our best estimate. More observations are needed to confirm or amend.
73
Wouter PA3WEG _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (2)
-
Nico Janssen -
Wouter Weggelaar