The first attempt scrubbed due to low engine thrust after ignition. The second attempt ended at less than 1 minute to go. There was no announcement on the live Internet feed about what the cause was or when the next attempt will be made.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
An announcement regarding the Second abort was made and the abort was manual due to engineers running out of time to review todays first abort data. You do not launch with a rocket that is even slightly unhealthy or has questioned health. Live to fly another day. Falcon 9 is held on the pad for several seconds after ignition while the on-board computer checks the rockets' health. If it doesn't like something it will not let the hold downs actuate on the launch pad allowing the rocket to move. Thus, the first abort. A similar abort after ignition was seen on the first launch attempt of C2+.
Bryce KB1LQC
On Thursday, November 28, 2013, B J wrote:
The first attempt scrubbed due to low engine thrust after ignition. The second attempt ended at less than 1 minute to go. There was no announcement on the live Internet feed about what the cause was or when the next attempt will be made.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org javascript:;. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
On 11/29/13, Bryce Salmi bstguitarist@gmail.com wrote:
An announcement regarding the Second abort was made and the abort was manual due to engineers running out of time to review todays first abort data. You do not launch with a rocket that is even slightly unhealthy or has questioned health. Live to fly another day. Falcon 9 is held on the pad for several seconds after ignition while the on-board computer checks the rockets' health. If it doesn't like something it will not let the hold downs actuate on the launch pad allowing the rocket to move. Thus, the first abort. A similar abort after ignition was seen on the first launch attempt of C2+.
At the time of the second abort, all I heard from the comm loop was one of the flight directors calling for a halt. Neither of SpaceX's commentators didn't go into great detail as to what the cause was. Even if the ground crew could have debugged the problem, there wouldn't have been any time to fly as the available launch window was nearly closed.
One of the space news sites I monitor indicated that Friday of next week would be the earliest available day. The details concerning that were rather vague, so it might have just been a rumour.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
<snip>
No problem! Just putting the info out there.
Bryce KB1LQC
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:13 PM, B J va6bmj@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/29/13, Bryce Salmi bstguitarist@gmail.com wrote:
An announcement regarding the Second abort was made and the abort was manual due to engineers running out of time to review todays first abort data. You do not launch with a rocket that is even slightly unhealthy or has questioned health. Live to fly another day. Falcon 9 is held on the
pad
for several seconds after ignition while the on-board computer checks the rockets' health. If it doesn't like something it will not let the hold downs actuate on the launch pad allowing the rocket to move. Thus, the first abort. A similar abort after ignition was seen on the first launch attempt of C2+.
At the time of the second abort, all I heard from the comm loop was one of the flight directors calling for a halt. Neither of SpaceX's commentators didn't go into great detail as to what the cause was. Even if the ground crew could have debugged the problem, there wouldn't have been any time to fly as the available launch window was nearly closed.
One of the space news sites I monitor indicated that Friday of next week would be the earliest available day. The details concerning that were rather vague, so it might have just been a rumour.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
<snip>
participants (2)
-
B J -
Bryce Salmi