![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/910fd427a70f34bf51b971e9dbe58604.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi
listened for Cute 1.7 on the 21:30 pass in range IO92 Just a strong carrier on the expected frequency. Lots of Doppler shift. Signal dissapeared at the predicted LOS.
Is cute 1.7 in trouble?
73 John G7HIA
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a0fabe782d56285ae354b58c11bcd2f3.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
My understanding is that Cute 1.7 is uncontrollable but has enough power to keep the transmitter sending a carrier all the time. Maybe someone else can clarify.
Zach KM7I
On 4/26/07, john heath [email protected] wrote:
Hi
listened for Cute 1.7 on the 21:30 pass in range IO92 Just a strong carrier on the expected frequency. Lots of Doppler shift. Signal dissapeared at the predicted LOS.
Is cute 1.7 in trouble?
73 John G7HIA _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (2)
-
john heath
-
Zachary Schrempp