... was constantly calling cq on top of us. Do these guys even listen to the downlink?
Personally, I would have privately emailed him and explained the situation ... BEFORE publicly demeaning him in any public message forum.
And I just sent him a private, polite email. Nothing accusatory. No calling him an "alligator" or "intentional interference source."
Let's see what we get as a response.
Clint K6LCS 909-241-7666
Clint, why on earth would you feel compelled to get in the middle of another ham's business or posting ?
you are truly amazing....a true 'legend in your own mind'
jeez, just shut up one in awhile
73, Ted, K7TRK
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Clint Bradford Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:26 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Interference
... was constantly calling cq on top of us. Do these guys even listen to
the downlink?
Personally, I would have privately emailed him and explained the situation ... BEFORE publicly demeaning him in any public message forum.
And I just sent him a private, polite email. Nothing accusatory. No calling him an "alligator" or "intentional interference source."
Let's see what we get as a response.
Clint K6LCS 909-241-7666
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
I dislike assholes in any aspect of my life. "Amateur radio" conversations should be positive and entertaining and educational experiences. And not a demeaning, name-calling, childish activity.
I suppose you also sent messages to the other two guys who wrote, "Way to go - insulting fellow hams is OK in my book!" - to tell them the same.
But, knowing you, I am sure you did not.
And so it goes ...
Clint K6LCS "Leaving quite a legacy in the amateur radio world, indeed."
On May 30, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Ted wrote:
Clint, why on earth would you feel compelled to get in the middle of another ham's business or posting ?
you are truly amazing....a true 'legend in your own mind'
jeez, just shut up one in awhile
73, Ted, K7TRK
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Clint Bradford Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:26 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Interference
... was constantly calling cq on top of us. Do these guys even listen to
the downlink?
Personally, I would have privately emailed him and explained the situation ... BEFORE publicly demeaning him in any public message forum.
And I just sent him a private, polite email. Nothing accusatory. No calling him an "alligator" or "intentional interference source."
Let's see what we get as a response.
Clint K6LCS 909-241-7666
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Clint Bradford, K6LCS 909-241-7666
The prosecution rests
-----Original Message----- From: Clint Bradford [mailto:clintbrad4d@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 1:49 PM To: Ted Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Interference
I dislike assholes in any aspect of my life. "Amateur radio" conversations should be positive and entertaining and educational experiences. And not a demeaning, name-calling,
childish activity.
I suppose you also sent messages to the other two guys who wrote, "Way to go - insulting fellow hams is OK in my book!" - to tell them the same.
But, knowing you, I am sure you did not.
And so it goes ...
Clint K6LCS "Leaving quite a legacy in the amateur radio world, indeed."
On May 30, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Ted wrote:
Clint, why on earth would you feel compelled to get in the middle of another ham's business or posting ?
you are truly amazing....a true 'legend in your own mind'
jeez, just shut up one in awhile
73, Ted, K7TRK
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Clint Bradford Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:26 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Interference
... was constantly calling cq on top of us. Do these guys even listen to
the downlink?
Personally, I would have privately emailed him and explained the situation ... BEFORE publicly demeaning him in any public message forum.
And I just sent him a private, polite email. Nothing accusatory. No calling him an "alligator" or "intentional interference source."
Let's see what we get as a response.
Clint K6LCS 909-241-7666
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Clint Bradford, K6LCS 909-241-7666
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Ted wrote:
Clint, why on earth would you feel compelled to get in the middle of another ham's business or posting ?
Another Ham's business... Talking (Complaining) about satellites... On a public mailing list... about... satellites... And we can't comment on it?
Wait... What?
BEN>> And we can't comment on it? Wait... What?
Ted has an "anti-Clint" war waging in his own mind. Not sure what started it. But he is surely one who sees the demonstrable successful promotion of this aspect of the amateur radio hobby by me as something he cannot deal with.
Clint Bradford, K6LCS 909-241-7666
I use the DELETE button when I dont like the crap posted and life goes on
----- Original Message ----- From: "Clint Bradford" clintbrad4d@earthlink.net To: "Ben Jackson" bbj@innismir.net Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 4:29:06 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SO-50 Interference
BEN>> And we can't comment on it? Wait... What?
Ted has an "anti-Clint" war waging in his own mind. Not sure what started it. But he is surely one who sees the demonstrable successful promotion of this aspect of the amateur radio hobby by me as something he cannot deal with.
Clint Bradford, K6LCS 909-241-7666
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Maybe the other ham the original guy was complaining about was working SO50 with a dual band/single receive HT himself and was not able to monitor the downlink while he was calling.
John -AG9D
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ben Jackson bbj@innismir.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Ted wrote:
Clint, why on earth would you feel compelled to get in the middle of
another ham's business or posting ?
Another Ham's business... Talking (Complaining) about satellites... On a public mailing list... about... satellites... And we can't comment on it?
Wait... What?
-- Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA bbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/
______________________________**_________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bbhttp://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (5)
-
Ben Jackson -
Clint Bradford -
John Spasojevich -
Ted -
wa4hfn＠comcast.net