I have been using LOTW and eQSL for over a year now. And it appears some are just entering their contacts now since it supports VUCC. I enter my contacts manually and sometimes I make a mistake when transferring from paper to electronic. So if anyone gets a rejection of my call, don't hesitate to drop me an email.
Jim
KE4KOL
Jim,
There is no notification if a QSO record does not match in LOTW. You can run queries on the LOTW web page to see which QSOs matched and those that aren't matched with the other station, and that is it. If people start posting that QSOs are in LOTW (or eQSL, for those using that), then others could quickly see if there are new QSLs.
LOTW will happily take QSO records that have the proper information and signed by the TQSL program - even if none of the QSO records are a match with anyone else. Hopefully you will see more QSLs from me in LOTW soon.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK http://www.wd9ewk.net/
On 1/22/11, Jim Bennett jlb3nn@bellsouth.net wrote:
I have been using LOTW and eQSL for over a year now. And it appears some are just entering their contacts now since it supports VUCC. I enter my contacts manually and sometimes I make a mistake when transferring from paper to electronic. So if anyone gets a rejection of my call, don't hesitate to drop me an email.
Jim
KE4KOL
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
participants (2)
-
Jim Bennett
-
Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)