We also need two SDXs in case one fails.
73,
John KD6OZH
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Hambly (W2GPS)" w2gps@cnssys.com To: "'Lyle Johnson'" kk7p@wavecable.com Cc: "'EAGLE'" eagle@amsat.org Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:26 UTC Subject: [eagle] Re: IF switching
Lyle,
I would like to see the ability to have independent U/V and L/S transponders operational simultaneously. If a single SDX lacks the power to accommodate this then I think we should consider two SDXs.
Rick W2GPS AMSAT LM2232
-----Original Message----- From: eagle-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:eagle-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Lyle Johnson Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:19 PM To: Jim Sanford Cc: 'EAGLE' Subject: [eagle] Re: IF switching
Short version: The matrix function is subsumed into the SDX modules.
To shed a bit more light, the SDX is designed with its own "matrix." There are two uplinks: U and L. The SDX can select either or both. It can send its output to V or S (or whatever the second downlink is now going to be) - or both.
At least, this is what we thought a year ago, and what we wrote up in the wiring harness report after the Colorado meeting last October.
73,
Lyle KK7P
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA Eagle@amsat.org http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA Eagle@amsat.org http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle