Chuck,
At least in this particular case jumpering across the switch didn’t
work. (See my log for today on Eaglepedia.)
Since the CAN-Do module is such an imbedded and pervasive component in
Eagle, I think it needs to be free of radiated and conducted EMI in both
directions. It's a great little interface but I'm afraid it has some very
serious shortcomings at the moment:
1. Conducts
noise back towards the power source where it can impact other loads on the same
power bus (one ohm of resistance out there was enough to screw up the
receiver.)
2. Provides
a noisy +14 to its load (the noise went right through the receiver like fat
through a goose and ended up in the IF as spurs.)
3. Radiates
EMI that can adversely affect sensitive circuitry at a distance of over two
inches from the rear of the PCB
Attempting to mitigate those problems will put a huge burden on every
payload and the adverse impact might not be fully known until integration and
test, if then. Trying to go back and band-aid something like this after
all the payloads come together would be a very bad corner to get backed
into. You could do what I did and sacrifice 2 inches of space inside
every module chassis, or you could try to build a two-section chassis and
filter the lines passing through the bulkhead, adding complexity. But
that doesn’t address the potential impact to another payload from the
spikes that are propagated back towards the common +14 bus.
I would expect that every receiver, block up or down converter, transmitter,
or amplifier will be impacted by this noise in a similar way. In my
opinion this is a global problem that needs a global solution. If the
CAN-Do module can be made EMI-free, or meet a yet to be determined EMI spec,
then all of the payloads teams can start their design with a known environment.
If the CAN-Do module is not modified then I think the only safe thing
to do is to build each payload so it can function using CAN-Do switched +14
volt power (the receiver can’t in the Rev-A configuration.) If your
payload can function with that noisy +14, without any adverse impact, then it
is probably a pretty well protected circuit and should be fairly immune to
whatever noise is added to the source by conducted EMI from other loads on the
power bus. It just seems simpler and cleaner to fix the problem at the
source.
I have an idea for a noise generator that I will stick on my log...
This could be the go/no go test for each payload. I’ll go sketch it
up and get it uploaded by about 2000 Pacific Time.
73,
Juan
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Green [mailto:greencl@mindspring.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 5:51 PM
To:
Cc: eagle@amsat.org; Bill Ress; Dave Black (Home); Dave Black (Work); Dave
hartzell; David Smith;
Subject: Re: [eagle] 70 cm Receiver IF Spurs - Problem Solved
Hi Juan,
One of the purposes of the CAN-Do! was to provide a standard interface
so that a module couldn't do something nasty and take out the entire
satellite. So custom mods to the CAN-Do! are not allowed.
Having said
that, we have always assumed that a jumper across the CAN-Do! power
switch would be installed for those modules that needed to be powered
up
no-matter-what.
Chuck
Juan Rivera wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> I don't want to tear into the CAN-Do module. I feel like it
is a loaner and
> not mine to modify. It would be interesting to disconnect
the switch and
> the current monitor from the CAN-Do power input and move it to
those user
> pins as you suggest. That might just work, but I also know
they don't want
> to have multiple versions of the module floating around and this
would be
> one.
>
> We also can't loose sight of the radiated noise from that
inductor. I can
> see signs of EMI if it gets within 2 inches of the sensitive areas
of the
> receiver.
>
> 73,
>
> Juan
>
>
> 73,
>
> Juan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Green [mailto:greencl@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 9:18 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [eagle] 70 cm Receiver IF Spurs - Problem Solved
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> I am impressed with your testing and analysis.
>
> I find it curious that you were unable to filter the power from
the
> CAN-Do! . But switching noise is notorious for being
difficult to
> filter. So maybe that is something to just forget. But in a
total
> system (satellite) it may not be possible to forget. We may
need to
> find a way to filter the power for sensitive modules even if not
using
> power from the CAN-Do! ; in which case, such a filter may also
filter
> the noise from the CAN-Do! .
>
> If your analysis is correct, and it certainly seems to be, then it
would
> also seem possible to remove the switch from the CAN-Do! (not just
> bypass it) and rout your clean power source through the CAN-Do!
current
> measurement circuit thus saving having to do this in the module.
>
> Great work! And thanks.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> Juan Rivera wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> Bad news I'm afraid. See my report for details...
I've sent out a link
>>
> to
>
>> the group.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Juan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chuck Green [mailto:greencl@mindspring.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 8:57 AM
>> To:
>> Cc: eagle@amsat.org; David Smith; Dave Black (Work); Dave
Black (Home);
>> Samsonoff@Mac. Com; Juan.Rivera (Work)
>> Subject: Re: [eagle] 70 cm Receiver IF Spurs - Problem Solved
>>
>> Hi Juan,
>>
>> This is fantastic!
>>
>> Please try one more experiment. Pass the module current
through the
>> current measuring circuit on the CAN-Do! while bypassing the
switch
>> transistor (you could just short across the switch transistor)
and see
>> if the problem reappears.
>>
>> If you end up having to use the user pins, you will need to
add current
>> measuring circuitry to your module. While this is no big
deal, its one
>> more thing you might not have to do.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> Juan Rivera wrote:
>>
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The 70 cm Receiver spur problem has been solved.
Click here
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
<http://www.juanr.com/pages/hobbies/ham_radio/Eagle/CAN-Do_Noise_Troubleshoo
>
>> ting.htm>
>>
>>
>>> for details.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Juan
>>>
>>> WA6HTP
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
>>> Eagle@amsat.org
>>> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>