I like it because it's clear (less cryptic) of what's offered and there's no implication of a hierarchy (i.e., "class" or numbering could be interpreted as there being more or less importance given to one type of service).
73, Ken N2WWD
-----Original Message----- From: eagle-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:eagle-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Matt Ettus Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:51 PM To: 'AMSAT Eagle' Subject: [eagle] Re: Service class names
The more I think about it, the more I think we don't need to name anything. We just say the satellite has these users:
U/V Linear L/S Linear Text messaging Low Rate ACP High Rate ACP
By not having an ordering, nobody gets slighted, and there is less confusion.
Matt _______________________________________________ Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA Eagle@amsat.org http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle