Dave,
This is a classic example of why a peer review is so important. You need to get folks that are not directly involved in your project to look it over with fresh eyes. We were too narrowly focused and missed the obvious. If multiple nodes all exist on the same twisted pair cable they much have different addresses. Duh...
73, Juan - WA6HTP
-----Original Message----- From: Dave hartzell [mailto:hartzell@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 5:06 PM To: juan-rivera@sbcglobal.net Cc: eagle@amsat.org; Robert McGwier Subject: Re: [eagle] YAHOO!!!! IT WORKS!!!!
Wow, this is a relief. I'm glad it was something simple....after all the hunting and pecking we did yesterday, I'm glad it was something so simple.
I guess when the term "bus" is used, an address as probably key to getting to your destination. ;-)
Dave
On 9/16/07, Juan Rivera juan-rivera@sbcglobal.net wrote:
All,
We need to take up a collection to buy Stephen a large hero badge. He
fixed
the problem and the receiver is now sitting on my bench happily receiving
a
signal. The new CAN-Do module that he sent me had a different address
than
the old one and the old files were addressing the initialization instructions to a non-existent device. All we have to do is change the address field in the initialization files and everything is fine.
Whew! The train of life in back on the tracks!
73 to all,
Juan
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA Eagle@amsat.org http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle