----- Original Message -----From: Jim SanfordTo: Howard LongCc: 'EAGLE'Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 23:55 UTCSubject: [eagle] Re: IF switchingHoward:
We have wanted to stay away from a matrix, for reaons of complexity, and to keep things simple -- no schedule for users to mess with.
It's not explicitly stated in that way, but has been in some emails, and can be inferred from the all transponders on all the time objective stated in various things in the past. Ultimately, power budget will probably be the major determinant in such things.
73,
Jim
wb4gcs@amsat.org
Howard Long wrote:Folks, I believe that I read somewhere recently (although I can't seem to find it now) that the concept of an IF switching matrix has been discounted. I don't know what the reason for this was, however on the basis that it seems clear that no-one is sure what bands may or may not be useable or available over the next few years, is it worth re-addressing this for feasibility? Howard _______________________________________________ Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA Eagle@amsat.org http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
_______________________________________________
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
Eagle@amsat.org
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle