All:
All systems should be designed to fail gracefully upon loss of the 10MHz reference.  This was a key discussion in the UHF peer review.
This will be clarified when I get a chance to update the FRD, which is low priority right now, compared to getting test results on U RX.
73,
Jim
[email protected]


Rick Hambly (W2GPS) wrote:
Bill,

s/c means SpaceCraft.

It is a waste of time to design for operation without the 10 MHz satellite
oscillator (it is not a clock). The design will simply need to be redone. On
the other hand, if designs incorporate their own soft fail options, so much
the better.

I expect a design for the 10MHz satellite reference based on a design Tom
and I have seen that includes its own soft fail redundancy. I will discuss
this possibility with Tom soon.

Rick
W2GPS
AMSAT LM2232
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Bill Ress
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: EAGLE
Subject: [eagle] Re: Eagle 10 MHz Clock

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your inputs.

Do you have a time frame for your USO benefactor's commitment to the 
program??

We're designing based on 10 MHz reference assumptions and that leaves 
me, at least,  with an empty feeling. Since over 10 subsystems will use 
this reference, it would be great to get this block defined.

As you know John has already designed for operating without the 10 MHz 
satellite clock and I'm also doing the same.

Oh - - - help with out Tom. You used "s/c ranging" in you one of your 
recent posts. The "s/c" stands for what??? S and C transponders??

Regards...Bill - N6GHz

Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
  
Bill Ress wrote:
  
    
(snip)

If indeed the clock is used by all LO's it is important that the LO 
designers know the reference's characteristics so that synthesis schemes 
and loop bandwidths can be better defined.
  
    
      
Assume that it is a low noise crystal. Signals will come from an N-port
driver that is a part of the USO. A good standard level will be 0 dBm
into 50 ohms (although it could be a tad higher -- like up to 1V RMS =
+13 dBm if really needed).

I would suggest that each user system could use the precision reference
if it is available, but should switch over to an internal oscillator if 
the precision source goes away. This is the way most counters, spectrum
analyzers, etc work and it permits a good, simple "fail soft" option.
  
    
With that in mind, can you Tom, 1) determine what the specs of the 
$ystem USO might be (or point me to a place when I might deduce them), 
and 2) what's a realistic time frame for deciding if that $ugar 
daddy/mommy comes through with a commitment? We not only have to get a 
handle on the 10 MHz oscillator but the RF distribution circuitry after
      
it.
  
In regards to the RF distribution circuitry, I count 8 users of the 10 
Mhz clock. Help me out here if I missed one....

1) V Transmitter
2) U Receiver (maybe two?)
3) L Receivers (two)
4) S Transmitter
5) S2 Receiver
6) C Transmitter
7) IHU
8) Spare (for X or K beacon or a "contributing" customer)
  
    
      
As Lyle mentioned, all the DSP widgets need the reference signal also.
For precise ranging it is likely that some really tight special DSP code
will be loaded into the DSP engines for maximum accuracy. This will be
to ensure the flattest possible phase response thru the system (the
group delay tau is measured as d(phase)/d(freq) over the however wide
the passband can be).

Thinking of obtaining the best possible accuracy, we may want to do U/V
and a microwave pair simultaneously to provide a calibration of the
ionosphere; the one-way group delay thru the ionosphere varies as 1/f²
and has a magnitude ~2M at S-band.

73, Tom



  
    

_______________________________________________
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
[email protected]
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle


_______________________________________________
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
[email protected]
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle