I agree on the tools but we bought a powerful server with good connectivity to handle just this kind of thing. I recommend that we use it.  Management of this asset is not that big a deal and I will get these tools installed ASAP. The hard work is setting up the tools for the project and that is no different no matter where it is done. The big advantage that we discovered in our disaster with is that we can control the internal tools and configuration, which you can’t always do on a shared computer. I will work with Dave or whoever is going to manage these tools to be sure the right accounts are established for the maintainers.






From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank Brickle
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:14 PM
To: Eric Blossom
Subject: [eagle] Re: revision control, wiki, web, etc.


On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Eric Blossom <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:57:13AM -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
> Please check out their services at:
> I would appreciate hearing everyone's thoughts on this.  I feel strongly
> that this is the right way to go.  This is a multi-million dollar
> project, so 20 bucks or so a month is in the noise.
> Matt

Sounds like a good idea to me.  Trac + svn provides great project infrastructure.

Sooner or later it's going to be essential. There's no better method for coordinating developers. Why not do it now?


The only thing we have to fear is whatever comes along next. -- Austin Cline