Hello John!
We also need two SDXs in case one fails.
QSL
This was always the plan. See docs from the Oct 2005 meeting in Colorado.
73,
Lyle KK7P
73,
John KD6OZH
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Hambly (W2GPS)" w2gps@cnssys.com To: "'Lyle Johnson'" kk7p@wavecable.com Cc: "'EAGLE'" eagle@amsat.org Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:26 UTC Subject: [eagle] Re: IF switching
Lyle,
I would like to see the ability to have independent U/V and L/S transponders operational simultaneously. If a single SDX lacks the power to accommodate this then I think we should consider two SDXs.
Rick W2GPS AMSAT LM2232
-----Original Message----- From: eagle-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:eagle-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Lyle Johnson Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:19 PM To: Jim Sanford Cc: 'EAGLE' Subject: [eagle] Re: IF switching
Short version: The matrix function is subsumed into the SDX modules.
To shed a bit more light, the SDX is designed with its own "matrix." There are two uplinks: U and L. The SDX can select either or both. It can send its output to V or S (or whatever the second downlink is now going to be) - or both.
At least, this is what we thought a year ago, and what we wrote up in the wiring harness report after the Colorado meeting last October.
73,
Lyle KK7P
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA Eagle@amsat.org http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA Eagle@amsat.org http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle