Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium will send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well and truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
Dan Schultz N8FGV
------ Original Message ------ Received: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:02:08 PM EDT From: "Frank Brickle" [email protected] To: "Daniel Schultz" [email protected]Cc: [email protected] Subject: [eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline
Dan --
Understand that I mean nothing controversial by saying this, but it's very unclear what the status of the Eagle and/or Intelsat projects *is*. There's potentially a lot to say, but hard to know whether any of it is pertinent
at
this point.
I was prepared to deliver a paper on AMSAT-specific aspects of the same topic (Delay Tolerant Networking) that I wrote up for DCC. The gist of the paper was an outline of the specific implementation of a comprehensive text-messaging service for Eagle. Given the current level of uncertainty even about *who* the teams are, and the ambient level of acrimony in the membership, it's questionable whether the time is worth spending.
73 Frank AB2KT
Would it be far from the truth?
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Schultz [email protected] wrote:
Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium will send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well and truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
Dan Schultz N8FGV
------ Original Message ------ Received: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:02:08 PM EDT From: "Frank Brickle" [email protected] To: "Daniel Schultz" [email protected]Cc: [email protected] Subject: [eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline
Dan --
Understand that I mean nothing controversial by saying this, but it's
very
unclear what the status of the Eagle and/or Intelsat projects *is*.
There's
potentially a lot to say, but hard to know whether any of it is pertinent
at
this point.
I was prepared to deliver a paper on AMSAT-specific aspects of the same topic (Delay Tolerant Networking) that I wrote up for DCC. The gist of
the
paper was an outline of the specific implementation of a comprehensive text-messaging service for Eagle. Given the current level of uncertainty even about *who* the teams are, and the ambient level of acrimony in the membership, it's questionable whether the time is worth spending.
73 Frank AB2KT
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA [email protected] http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 17:14 -0400, Daniel Schultz wrote:
Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium will send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well and truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
Is it what I want? No. But I see no evidence that it isn't the truth.
73 - Bdale, KB0G
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Schultz [email protected] wrote:
Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium will send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well and truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
Dan, you've put your finger on a significant piece of the problem.
Most of the work I thought about presenting has been ready to integrate into a test/prototype system for over two years. There's no way it can be represented as progress.
73 Frank AB2KT
Dan, The message, as I read it from several AMSAT senior designers and engineers, is very clear. Please make sure that the BoD is both aware of the message and it's meaning. Robin Haighton VE3FRH
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Schultz Sent: September 6, 2008 5:15 PM To: Frank Brickle; [email protected] Subject: [eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline
Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium will send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well and truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
Dan Schultz N8FGV
------ Original Message ------ Received: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:02:08 PM EDT From: "Frank Brickle" [email protected] To: "Daniel Schultz" [email protected]Cc: [email protected] Subject: [eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline
Dan --
Understand that I mean nothing controversial by saying this, but it's very unclear what the status of the Eagle and/or Intelsat projects *is*.
There's
potentially a lot to say, but hard to know whether any of it is pertinent
at
this point.
I was prepared to deliver a paper on AMSAT-specific aspects of the same topic (Delay Tolerant Networking) that I wrote up for DCC. The gist of the paper was an outline of the specific implementation of a comprehensive text-messaging service for Eagle. Given the current level of uncertainty even about *who* the teams are, and the ambient level of acrimony in the membership, it's questionable whether the time is worth spending.
73 Frank AB2KT
_______________________________________________ Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA [email protected] http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
participants (5)
-
Bdale Garbee -
Daniel Schultz -
David Goncalves -
Frank Brickle -
R.Haighton