Does anyone on the team think we need an analog RF engineer at
this point. Let me know if you think we do. I don't want to
dilute our team meetings with "observers"....
Subject: | Re: Fwd: ITAR/EAR "Clearance" Process |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:12:44 +0000 |
From: | Jonathan Brandenburg <jonathan@jonathanbrandenburg.com> |
To: | Bill Reed <bill@brconnect.com> |
Any idea what his skill set is?
On 8/28/2023 8:36 AM, Jonathan Brandenburg wrote:
Bill,
Dave Benzel (email address below) is expressing an interest in discussion packet sats... If you want (it's entirely up to you) would you like to contact him as a potential volunteer?
He attended one weekly engineering meeting and I take it he doesn't want to participate in structured meetings so I'm not sure how to engage him but I figure I'll let you know there's interest from him in packet sats.
Jonathan
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: ITAR/EAR "Clearance" Process Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:37:18 -0500 From: benzoid19@mindspring.com <benzoid19@mindspring.com> Reply-To: benzoid19@mindspring.com <benzoid19@mindspring.com> To: Jonathan Brandenburg <jonathan@jonathanbrandenburg.com>
Hi Jonathan -
Thanks for note. No, nothing specific. At this point in my career, I am just looking for less structure... which doesn't really seem to fit in with your perfectly appropriate way of conducting projects.
Thanks for keeping me in mind - I would really enjoy making what ever contribution I can, that may help unload some of your other folks. Seems like a great bunch, and can't wait to see us get more hardware in orbit.
I'd like to send you some ideas I had on packet sats - working with the really fun IO-117 sat gave me a few ideas on how to improve this general system. Haahaaha - probably nothing you all haven't already thought of though !!
- dB KD6RF
-- Jonathan Brandenburg 1-214-213-1066 jonathan@jonathanbrandenburg.com Using ProtonMail secure email service.