I'm in the process of finishing some of the missing software components. I was waiting for confirmation on budget but with that unlikely I decided to proceed anyway. I'm going to see if I can document things much better as I suspect this could end up sitting on a shelf. Alan is also implementing the pi-pacsat for the cubesatsim, so I will continue to help with that as well.

73 Chris

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025, 17:36 Bob Stricklin via pacsat-dev < [email protected]> wrote:

This is a nice summary of the status of the PASAT project. Bill has done a great job shepherding it along and the efforts can be enjoyed by future AMSAT missions.

Bob

...

On Mar 11, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Bill Reed via pacsat-dev <

[email protected]> wrote:

...

March 11, 2025

Dear pacsat team,

I want to tell you where I think pacsat stands today. We still have no

funding, but I have had

...

a discussion with Gerry Buxton about the project and I will try to

convey to you what I have

...

heard him say. ( Gerry, please correct me if I am wrong.)

2024 ended with a successful pacsat prototype. Our blinky board works

but it needs a

...

few tweaks before it could fly. Our software works. It may have a few

minor defects and

...

missing a few enhancements, but it is basically ready for flight. The

ground station

...

software is ready.

I anticipated that 2025 would be a milestone year. I believed we could

build flight ready

...

modules. Consequently, in November 2024 I submitted our 2025 pacsat

budget. I believe

...

that budgets establish a projects direction. I proposed a budget that

would, in my mind,

...

establish that direction.

I proposed the following:

Monies to resolve the few existing hardware issues with the blinky

board.

...

It cost us $2000 to build each blinky board and I felt we would need

to

...

prototype a few fixes.  Instead of $2000 for each tweak,  I proposed

that

...

we enhance our launchpad design at a cost of $150 for each tweak and
then consolidate our final design layout on a cubesat size board.
This budget item has not been funded yet.  I am hopeful it will be.

I recognized that the current design that used the AX5043 was

limited.

...

The AX5043 is out of production.  We purchased some supply of parts
from questionable suppliers, hoping that those parts were acceptable.
Also, the AX5043 was limited to FM packets at 1200 bps AFSK and 9600
bsp GFSK.  We would need a new design if we expected to use higher
data rates and new protocols.  I proposed that we start a software
designed radio (SDR) effort for that new design.  Gerry indicated to

me

...

that an SDR design effort would not be funded.

The University of North Dakota satellite group contacted me

indicating

...

they would like to fly a pacsat board on an upcoming mission. They
indicated that previous attempts to contact AMSAT had failed. They
had no design interface at that time, but I agreed to work with them
as their flight mission progressed.  I proposed some monies in the
2025 budget to build them some prototype boards.  Gerry indicated
to me that effort would not be funded.

ARISS engineering approached me about a pacsat system on the
International Space Station.  Again we had no design requirements
but I proposed some monies to support any hardware we might build
for them.  Gerry indicated to me that effort would not be funded.

Gerry did suggest that we build several "generic" pacsat boards
and place those boards in inventory.  I think we have a challenge
in defining what a "generic flight board" consists of.  It could be
as simple as our blinky prototype board cleaned up for flight.
There are a few interface issues that need to be resolved.

Gerry indicated that the Fox-Plus-B flight still planned
to fly a pacsat board on that mission.  There has been
much discussion about the project but no interface
description has been provided.  I don't know what
Gerry plans for us to do but I am sure that he will
provide direction in the future.  I requested funding
for this mission but the status of that funding is unknown.

I believe that the pacsat team's efforts over the last two years have been exceptional. I want to thank all of you for your efforts.

From a personal standpoint, my funding efforts have been very frustrating. I submitted my budget proposal last November and I expected that to be approved by January 1, 2025. In my mind that's the way that budgets work. Now, without any budget at all, we are not knowing which projects we should be working on and how we might progress.

I have decided to step back from my role as pacsat team lead. I still intend to be a member of the pacsat team, but at this point I would like to participate in the SDR design task. If it continues to be unfunded then I will need to determine how we might proceed.

Please don't give up on our pacsat efforts. We have a great design and we can make it successful.

Bill Reed, NX5R

---

pacsat-dev mailing list -- [email protected] View archives of this mailing list at

https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]

...

To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at

https://mailman.amsat.org

---

pacsat-dev mailing list -- [email protected] View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org