Re: Latchup Protection and Watchdog Parts
And - as long as I'm thinking about it, we had to disable the hardware watchdog on the RT-IHU to get it to run. I don't recall if that changed, but if you get some RT-IHU boards, you might need to jumper the hardware WD disable.
Rich
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:40 PM Rich Gopstein via pacsat-dev < [email protected]> wrote:
Burns might remember the details (or Zach certainly would), but one of those parts was undersized for the RT-IHU and would cut out when we were transmitting with the ax5043. I think we had to back down the xmit power in order for the device not to reset.
Rich
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jonathan Brandenburg via pacsat-dev < [email protected]> wrote:
In last week's meeting, I noted I had been looking at the schematics for Fox-1 and RT-IHU and found the circuits for the latchup protection and watchdog functions. I admit this might be basic to some, but I'm finding it fascinating! Anyway...
Since last week's meeting, I researched the parts used:
onsemi FPF2001 is a current limit switch used on both Fox-1 and half the RT-IHU. It's obsolete, replaced by onsemi's FPF2000. But the FPF2000 is listed as end-of-life. It's replacement part is the TI TPS22942.
MAX4995 is a current limit switch used on the other half of the. This part looks good for new designs.
For the watchdog functionality, both Fox-1 and RT-IHU use the STWD100NYWY3F chip. this parts looks good for new designs.
That's as far as I got. Next, I want to research the Fox-1 and RT-IHU designs to determine the thresholds of the current limit switches. In particular, I want to see if the TPS22942 is a suitable replacement, assuming we have the same current requirements.
That's where I'm at,
Jonathan
-- Jonathan Brandenburg Radio Amateur Satellite Corporation 1-214-213-1066
pacsat-dev mailing list -- [email protected] View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org
pacsat-dev mailing list -- [email protected] View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org
This I didn't know! Does anybody on the list know why the hardware watchdog wasn't working as expected on the RT-IHU?
Jonathan
On 1/19/23 17:43, Rich Gopstein wrote:
And - as long as I'm thinking about it, we had to disable the hardware watchdog on the RT-IHU to get it to run. I don't recall if that changed, but if you get some RT-IHU boards, you might need to jumper the hardware WD disable.
Rich
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:40 PM Rich Gopstein via pacsat-dev [email protected] wrote:
Burns might remember the details (or Zach certainly would), but one of those parts was undersized for the RT-IHU and would cut out when we were transmitting with the ax5043. I think we had to back down the xmit power in order for the device not to reset. Rich On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jonathan Brandenburg via pacsat-dev <[email protected]> wrote: In last week's meeting, I noted I had been looking at the schematics for Fox-1 and RT-IHU and found the circuits for the latchup protection and watchdog functions. I admit this might be basic to some, but I'm finding it fascinating! Anyway... Since last week's meeting, I researched the parts used: onsemi FPF2001 is a current limit switch used on both Fox-1 and half the RT-IHU. It's obsolete, replaced by onsemi's FPF2000. But the FPF2000 is listed as end-of-life. It's replacement part is the TI TPS22942. MAX4995 is a current limit switch used on the other half of the. This part looks good for new designs. For the watchdog functionality, both Fox-1 and RT-IHU use the STWD100NYWY3F chip. this parts looks good for new designs. That's as far as I got. Next, I want to research the Fox-1 and RT-IHU designs to determine the thresholds of the current limit switches. In particular, I want to see if the TPS22942 is a suitable replacement, assuming we have the same current requirements. That's where I'm at, Jonathan -- Jonathan Brandenburg Radio Amateur Satellite Corporation 1-214-213-1066 ----------------------------------------------------------- pacsat-dev mailing list -- [email protected] View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org ----------------------------------------------------------- pacsat-dev mailing list -- [email protected] View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org
participants (2)
-
Jonathan Brandenburg -
Rich Gopstein