I'm concerned about time for sure. I don't really have any. But I'm wondering if UND is also the place that is talking about using an LTM. In which case, the integration of these two things is an issue.

73,

Burns Fisher, WB1FJ *AMSAT(R) Engineering -- Flight Software*

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:06 AM Bill Reed via pacsat-dev < pacsat-dev@amsat.org> wrote:

Team,

Well, we learned from the budget situation that our ASCENT direction was to build a"proof of concept" solution. I am not sure at this point why we are restricted and if this is an AMSAT officer (Jerry or Robert) or a BOD restriction.

With that in mind, I was contacted over the weekend by a university that wants to launch pacsat. The University of North Dakota is launching a 3U cubesat, probably in mid to late 2025. They have a commitment for an ELANA launch but no firm dates yet. They have .5U available out of 3U.

So we need to make a decision here:

1. Do we want to support this launch? (Don't know yet how much support

they will need. Probably lots.)

2. Do we have the time to provide support?

3. If you think it is good timing, I will invite the UND project lead (

Dr. Ron Fevig ) to our Thursday meeting.

If we decide to move forward with this we will need to get Jerry's permission to move beyond a pure ASCENT project.

Please let me know your feelings ASAP. I have a meeting with Dr. Fevig this afternoon and will try to better understand their requirements.

Please let me know your feelings ASAP. ( 2nd request) I want to kill this if we don't think we can do it.

Bill

---

pacsat-dev mailing list -- pacsat-dev@amsat.org View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/pacsat-dev@amsat.org To unsubscribe send an email to pacsat-dev-leave@amsat.org Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org