The UHF is located next to the VHF radio (Kenwood D700 is dual band).
I still don't see how one frequency will make the crew leave their satellite communications, email, IP phone, DVD movies, photography, book reading.... If they have no interest in talking on the radio then they just turn the volume down on the radio. If they are interested, then they become sort of rare DX and operate in the accepted split fashion.
Kenneth - N5VHO
--- McGrane tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
good try but no cigar! I'm writing about 2 meters VHF where there is very little doppler and higher power. But with all due respect, where is the UHF radio located and is it left on?
Maybe we should make some coffee HUH?
pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Kenneth, N5VHO wrote:
Oh, I forgot that we do have a simplex frequency
the
ISS uses. 437.55. Problem solved.
Kenneth - N5VHO
--- McGrane tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
Then take it up with the russians and get their opinion. bantor the idea about. As it is, theres very
little
phone activity, and maybe, just maybe, if we call them, they might
pick
up the mike. Thanks if you consider the change. pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Kenneth, N5VHO wrote:
Who did you have in mind to "have their way
with
the
space program"? Doesn't seem to be to many
other
folks
running ham radio in their manned space
programs.
One group is the Russians who have a lot to do
with
ham radio being on ISS. It is after all not
located in
the USA segement but the Russian Segment of
the
ISS.
Kenneth - N5VHO
--- McGrane tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us
wrote:
Hi bob- You must live in a bad area. My
fellow
amateurs always quieted down when they heard an astronaut calling
someone.
Seems like you and NASA are pretty set in your ways. Dont you think
its
time
to let some others have their way with the space program? I remeber an joke I heard years ago; NASA
spent
a
million dollars to develop a pen that would write in zero
gravity......
the russians used pencils. I see no open-mindedness here. pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Robert Bruninga wrote:
> Hello again- the astronauts will hear
everyone
calling
> whether its split or simplex operation
so
why
not make it
simplex!
Because many of us live near inconsiderate
operators that step
all Over the downlink by transmitting on the
uplink.
Simplex is
just not a good idea. The downlink should be separate from the
uplink so
that everyone
can hear the downlink without
interfererence
from
uplink
stations.
Bob
> -----Original Message----- > From: sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org > [mailto:sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org] On
Behalf
Of
McGrane
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 7:43 PM > To: Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BAR] Ransom;
bruninga@usna.edu
> Cc: Manned space BBS > Subject: [sarex] Re: further late reply
regarding ISS simplex
> > > Hello again- the astronauts will hear
everyone
calling
> whether its split or simplex operation
so
why
not make it
simplex! > > pat > > > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Ransom, Kenneth G.
(JSC-OC)[BAR] wrote:
> > > It sounds like your issue is not that
split
frequencies are
bad but > > that multiple uplinks makes it
difficult
for
the crew to
> listen to one > > uplink. ITU region regulations for
ground
station
> operations are the > > culprit. Space has no borders but
Earth
does
so have of the
> problem is > > getting everyone to agree on a single
uplink.
Not everyone
in the > > world has the same frequency
allocations
nor
do they use
> the available > > spectrum in their region the same way. > > > > The issue is not the 20-30 miles but
the
number of callers
> in the 2000 > > km wide footprint. The station has to
listen
to all of
> them. Since you > > can't hear all of them, it becomes
difficult
to know when
> someone is > > talking or not without guidance from
the
station operator.
> > > > In the MIR days, the crew did not have
the
luxury of near
full time > > satellite communication that provides
voice,
> communication and > > an IP phone that lets them make phone
calls.
If the MIR
> crew wanted to > > talk to someone, they needed to use
the
ham
radio or the
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com