Then take it up with the russians and get their opinion. bantor the idea about. As it is, theres very little phone activity, and maybe, just maybe, if we call them, they might pick up the mike. Thanks if you consider the change. pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Kenneth, N5VHO wrote:
Who did you have in mind to "have their way with the space program"? Doesn't seem to be to many other folks running ham radio in their manned space programs.
One group is the Russians who have a lot to do with ham radio being on ISS. It is after all not located in the USA segement but the Russian Segment of the ISS.
Kenneth - N5VHO
--- McGrane tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
Hi bob- You must live in a bad area. My fellow amateurs always quieted down when they heard an astronaut calling someone. Seems like you and NASA are pretty set in your ways. Dont you think its time to let some others have their way with the space program? I remeber an joke I heard years ago; NASA spent a million dollars to develop a pen that would write in zero gravity...... the russians used pencils. I see no open-mindedness here. pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Robert Bruninga wrote:
Hello again- the astronauts will hear everyone
calling
whether its split or simplex operation so why
not make it
simplex!
Because many of us live near inconsiderate
operators that step
all Over the downlink by transmitting on the uplink.
Simplex is
just not a good idea. The downlink should be separate from the uplink so
that everyone
can hear the downlink without interfererence from
uplink
stations.
Bob
-----Original Message----- From: sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org [mailto:sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org] On Behalf Of
McGrane
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 7:43 PM To: Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BAR] Ransom;
bruninga@usna.edu
Cc: Manned space BBS Subject: [sarex] Re: further late reply
regarding ISS simplex
Hello again- the astronauts will hear everyone
calling
whether its split or simplex operation so why
not make it
simplex!
pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Ransom, Kenneth G.
(JSC-OC)[BAR] wrote:
It sounds like your issue is not that split
frequencies are
bad but
that multiple uplinks makes it difficult for
the crew to
listen to one
uplink. ITU region regulations for ground
station
operations are the
culprit. Space has no borders but Earth does
so have of the
problem is
getting everyone to agree on a single uplink.
Not everyone
in the
world has the same frequency allocations nor
do they use
the available
spectrum in their region the same way.
The issue is not the 20-30 miles but the
number of callers
in the 2000
km wide footprint. The station has to listen
to all of
them. Since you
can't hear all of them, it becomes difficult
to know when
someone is
talking or not without guidance from the
station operator.
In the MIR days, the crew did not have the
luxury of near
full time
satellite communication that provides voice,
communication and
an IP phone that lets them make phone calls.
If the MIR
crew wanted to
talk to someone, they needed to use the ham
radio or the
Russian VHF
space to ground system. The ISS crew has
plenty of options
to choose
from when they want to communicate and it
depends on the
personality
of the crew as to which ones get utilized.
Kenneth - N5VHO
-----Original Message----- From: sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org
[mailto:sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org] On
Behalf Of McGrane Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:43 PM To: Manned space BBS Subject: [sarex] further late reply regarding
ISS simplex
Greetings from patrick N2OEQ
Despite support of the present frequency
scheme for the ISS
I still
wish to disagree with the policy of split
operation with
different
phone uplinks.
Back when the MIR was up, the russians
operated simplex and
left the
radio on to listen for callers. On several occasions, I called the MIR
according to my
tracking
program and was rewarded several times with a
response.
With two different uplink frequencies, the
astronauts are
less
inclined to leave the radio on to listen for
callers.
When there were several callers here on
simplex responding
to a CQ
call from the MIR, we acted civilized and took
turns and
everyone made
contacts so I dont buy the absolute need for
split
operation.
Besides, how many callers could there be
within 20 or 30
miles up to
the horizon.
We've had years of robot like amateur radio on
the ISS. How
about
loosening the ties!
Thanks for the soapbox..... pat
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG
courtesy of
AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, visit
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy
of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, visit
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA. To unsubscribe, visit http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com