good try but no cigar! I'm writing about 2 meters VHF where there is very little doppler and higher power. But with all due respect, where is the UHF radio located and is it left on?
Maybe we should make some coffee HUH?
pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Kenneth, N5VHO wrote:
Oh, I forgot that we do have a simplex frequency the ISS uses. 437.55. Problem solved.
Kenneth - N5VHO
--- McGrane tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
Then take it up with the russians and get their opinion. bantor the idea about. As it is, theres very little phone activity, and maybe, just maybe, if we call them, they might pick up the mike. Thanks if you consider the change. pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Kenneth, N5VHO wrote:
Who did you have in mind to "have their way with
the
space program"? Doesn't seem to be to many other
folks
running ham radio in their manned space programs.
One group is the Russians who have a lot to do
with
ham radio being on ISS. It is after all not
located in
the USA segement but the Russian Segment of the
ISS.
Kenneth - N5VHO
--- McGrane tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
Hi bob- You must live in a bad area. My fellow amateurs always quieted down when they heard an astronaut calling
someone.
Seems like you and NASA are pretty set in your ways. Dont you think its
time
to let some others have their way with the space program? I remeber an joke I heard years ago; NASA spent
a
million dollars to develop a pen that would write in zero
gravity......
the russians used pencils. I see no open-mindedness here. pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Robert Bruninga wrote:
Hello again- the astronauts will hear
everyone
calling
whether its split or simplex operation so
why
not make it
simplex!
Because many of us live near inconsiderate
operators that step
all Over the downlink by transmitting on the
uplink.
Simplex is
just not a good idea. The downlink should be separate from the
uplink so
that everyone
can hear the downlink without interfererence
from
uplink
stations.
Bob
-----Original Message----- From: sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org [mailto:sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org] On Behalf
Of
McGrane
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 7:43 PM To: Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BAR] Ransom;
bruninga@usna.edu
Cc: Manned space BBS Subject: [sarex] Re: further late reply
regarding ISS simplex
Hello again- the astronauts will hear
everyone
calling
whether its split or simplex operation so
why
not make it
simplex!
pat
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Ransom, Kenneth G.
(JSC-OC)[BAR] wrote:
> It sounds like your issue is not that
split
frequencies are
bad but
> that multiple uplinks makes it difficult
for
the crew to
listen to one > uplink. ITU region regulations for ground
station
operations are the > culprit. Space has no borders but Earth
does
so have of the
problem is > getting everyone to agree on a single
uplink.
Not everyone
in the
> world has the same frequency allocations
nor
do they use
the available > spectrum in their region the same way. > > The issue is not the 20-30 miles but the
number of callers
in the 2000 > km wide footprint. The station has to
listen
to all of
them. Since you > can't hear all of them, it becomes
difficult
to know when
someone is > talking or not without guidance from the
station operator.
> > In the MIR days, the crew did not have the
luxury of near
full time
> satellite communication that provides
voice,
communication and > an IP phone that lets them make phone
calls.
If the MIR
crew wanted to > talk to someone, they needed to use the
ham
radio or the
Russian VHF > space to ground system. The ISS crew has
plenty of options
to choose > from when they want to communicate and it
depends on the
personality > of the crew as to which ones get utilized. > > Kenneth - N5VHO > > -----Original Message----- > From: sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org
[mailto:sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org] On
> Behalf Of McGrane > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:43 PM > To: Manned space BBS > Subject: [sarex] further late reply
regarding
ISS simplex
> > > Greetings from patrick N2OEQ > > Despite support of the present frequency
scheme for the ISS
I still
> wish to disagree with the policy of split
operation with
different
> phone uplinks. > > Back when the MIR was up, the russians
operated simplex and
left the > radio on to listen for callers. > On several occasions, I called the MIR
according to my
tracking
> program and was rewarded several times
with a
response.
> > With two different uplink frequencies, the
astronauts are
=== message truncated ===
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com