----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tondee" [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:23 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LMR400 or 400UF? (Thanks and further comments)
I think I sent this to Sebastian when I in fact meant to send it to the whole BBS. My aplogies if it's a duplicate post. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tondee" [email protected] To: "Sebastian" [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: LMR400 or 400UF? (Thanks and further comments)
So what I'm getting from everyone is to go with a section of 400UF between the antenna and the preamp and the just the regular 400 down into the shack. I think that should certainly be better than what I have now anyway. Any further comments? Tnx and 73, Michael
Hi Michael,
No further comments and concerning transmission line losses It is the best compromise both for RX and TX conditions. Have you looked at the following article ?
"Receiver Noise Figure Sensitivity and Dinamic Range ,what the Numbar mean" by James R. Fisk, W1DTY Ham Radio Magazine october 1975
73" de
i8CVS Domenico