Michael,
Thanks for the quick and calm response.
Well I don't know but it seems like to me that same
handheld antenna mounted on a tripod and using small
DC motors to track the satellite in both the azimuth
and elevation planes ( something like Mark Spencers
latest creation) along with full blown doppler correction
being provided along with it from some type of "black
box" transceiver and/or interface which was assembled
from a reasonably inexpensive kit and is being run by an
iphone , droid or tablet with an app or possibly by a
laptop and the whole shebang being powered from a
reasonable sized cluster of li poly batteries is much
more impressive than a guy with an HT pointing an antenna
in the air with his hand.
That may be the case, but that - like beauty - is in the eye of the beholder.
I was expecting to see a response with something that hadn't already been proposed, but this is something more than just saying that we need to do something different without finishing that thought.
Mark Spencer, a long-time satellite operator, has done a lot for this corner of our hobby. He's also an all- around good guy. :-)
IMO that also would not seem unattainable and monetarily
out of reach to the average joe ham who has somewhat
bothered to keep up with the technology available to him
or her today. I know I would love such a system. You
could also have a demonstration of the simpler hand held
station going and let people make up their own mind which
had more appeal and "cool" factor. My idea isn't so
complex that it overwhelms but is not so simple that it
totally takes away the "wow" factor either.
Agreed. Mark Spencer's idea (using his WRAPS rotator) is cool. When it becomes available, I will probably buy one and incorporate that as part of my hamfest demonstration station - which will also be motivation to finally use SatPC32 to control my FT-817NDs. I may not use the rotator when I go out to unusual locations to put them on the air, but it will be interesting to see those rotators in action. I saw one at the AMSAT Symposium where he gave a presentation about it (a video of that is on my YouTube channel), and I like it.
What others perceive as "cool" depends on what they are looking for. Some like the hi-tech setups, others like the simpler setups, and some like both. I think John K8YSE has written an article about his remote-controlled satellite stations that will appear in an upcoming AMSAT Journal, as an example that might closer approach what you're looking for. John may not be using SDR radios as is your preference, but he now has two complete satellite stations he can operate when sitting in front of the radios, or from anywhere he has Internet access. Then there are hams like me who are pushing the limits with a simpler and very portable station - yet have opportunities to experiment by trying different station components (different antennas, radios, etc.) without breaking the bank.
Living in a rental house in an HOA-controlled area, I can't put up antennas on the house or property. I can stay active using my portable gear and have a fully-functional station for satellite operating, even if it is at the opposite end of the spectrum from what you are interested in. And I'm having fun doing this. Maybe I need to go to a support group... "Hi, my name is Patrick, and I enjoy working satellites and doing demonstrations at hamfests with a simple station." Or am I in one right here? :-)
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK http://www.wd9ewk.net/