Re: LMR400 or 400UF? (Thanks and further comments)
I think I sent this to Sebastian when I in fact meant to send it to the whole BBS. My aplogies if it's a duplicate post. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tondee" mat_62@netcommander.com To: "Sebastian" w4as@bellsouth.net Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: LMR400 or 400UF? (Thanks and further comments)
First of all, thanks to everyone who responded to my query about coax. I know sometimes we may get in disagreements on this BBS but when I have a technical question I'm not sure of, I count on advice from here and I'm not ever dissapointed. The existing coax feeding the antenna is 9913 and as we all know, it has problems. It was all I had though at the time I was constructing my station. I am more than certain now though that it has moisture in it and is causing Rx and TX problems. I would say that the run from the preamp to the antenna is 6 to 8 feet of coax and right now that's RG8U. I was thinking that loss was negligible but I guess every little bit of signal I can squeeze out there is important. There is also about a 5 foot run of RG8U in the shack that goes between the back of the rig and a "disconnect" point I have that I can easily reach. I'm thinking that this piece won't cause much of a problem. So what I'm getting from everyone is to go with a section of 400UF between the antenna and the preamp and the just the regular 400 down into the shack. I think that should certainly be better than what I have now anyway. Any further comments? Tnx and 73, Michael
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tondee" mat_62@netcommander.com To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:23 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LMR400 or 400UF? (Thanks and further comments)
I think I sent this to Sebastian when I in fact meant to send it to the whole BBS. My aplogies if it's a duplicate post. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tondee" mat_62@netcommander.com To: "Sebastian" w4as@bellsouth.net Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: LMR400 or 400UF? (Thanks and further comments)
So what I'm getting from everyone is to go with a section of 400UF between the antenna and the preamp and the just the regular 400 down into the shack. I think that should certainly be better than what I have now anyway. Any further comments? Tnx and 73, Michael
Hi Michael,
No further comments and concerning transmission line losses It is the best compromise both for RX and TX conditions. Have you looked at the following article ?
"Receiver Noise Figure Sensitivity and Dinamic Range ,what the Numbar mean" by James R. Fisk, W1DTY Ham Radio Magazine october 1975
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
participants (2)
-
i8cvs
-
Michael Tondee