7 Sep
2008
7 Sep
'08
4:37 a.m.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Schultz n8fgv@usa.net wrote:
Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium will send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well and truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
Dan, you've put your finger on a significant piece of the problem.
Most of the work I thought about presenting has been ready to integrate into a test/prototype system for over two years. There's no way it can be represented as progress.
73 Frank AB2KT
--
To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle -- George
Orwell