Does anyone on the team think we need an analog RF engineer at this point. Let me know if you think we do. I don't want to dilute our team meetings with "observers"....
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Fwd: ITAR/EAR "Clearance" Process Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:12:44 +0000 From: Jonathan Brandenburg [email protected] To: Bill Reed [email protected]
His background is analog RF engineering, I believe. Jonathan
On 8/28/2023 9:04 AM, Bill Reed wrote:
Any idea what his skill set is?
On 8/28/2023 8:36 AM, Jonathan Brandenburg wrote:
Bill,
Dave Benzel (email address below) is expressing an interest in discussion packet sats... If you want (it's entirely up to you) would you like to contact him as a potential volunteer?
He attended one weekly engineering meeting and I take it he doesn't want to participate in structured meetings so I'm not sure how to engage him but I figure I'll let you know there's interest from him in packet sats.
Jonathan
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: ITAR/EAR "Clearance" Process Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:37:18 -0500 From: [email protected] [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected] [email protected] To: Jonathan Brandenburg [email protected]
Hi Jonathan -
Thanks for note. No, nothing specific. At this point in my career, I am just looking for less structure... which doesn't really seem to fit in with your perfectly appropriate way of conducting projects.
Thanks for keeping me in mind - I would really enjoy making what ever contribution I can, that may help unload some of your other folks. Seems like a great bunch, and can't wait to see us get more hardware in orbit.
I'd like to send you some ideas I had on packet sats - working with the really fun IO-117 sat gave me a few ideas on how to improve this general system. Haahaaha - probably nothing you all haven't already thought of though !!
- dB KD6RF