Dear Paul and Steve,
Thank you! Your comments were highly valuable to me!
I am looking to improve my portable ground station and,
at the same time, see if I can help others with theirs
too. A goal is to help elevate hand-held Arrow users
up to the next levels of performance, to picnic table
portable.
And perhaps with Az-El mounting capability, either
motorized manual or automated.
David W2LNX was working on a nice Az-El "Cheap- Rotator"
assembly, so I was thinking of a summer of 2014 project,
building and seeing if the C P "Cheap-Yagi" as you
mention could be improved upon. Wouldn't it be nice
to hold next year's AMSAT-DC workshop on assembling
something like an improved cheap CP UHF yagi!
FYI, here are some other reviews I just found:
Gulf Alpha Reviews
http://gulfalphaantennas.com/S%20TAKES.pdfhttp://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/amsat-bb/200812/msg00551.htmlhttp://www.k4lrg.org/Projects/432_MHz_Yagi_Prototype/http://www.w5pfg.us/2013/01/gulf-alpha-circular-polarized-vhf-5x5.htmlhttp://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php/topic,65620.0.html (two
pages)
http://forums.qrz.com/archive/index.php/t-265979.htmlhttp://www.dxzone.com/dx22904/gulf-alpha-communication-antennas.html
Thanks again!
Cheers,
Pat
N8PK
On May 1, 2014 at 9:35 PM Stephan Greene <ks1g04(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Pat:
>
> I think rotating for polarity matching is more important on the
> downlink. On uplink, more TX power may be simpler/easier as needed.
> I've wanted a bit more gain than what I get from the 4 or 6 element
> linear-polarized yagi on 2M. I keep thinking about building a CP
> cheap-yagi.
>
> The issue with a CP antenna is transport. You might be able to get
> same effect with 2 linear antennas and appropriate phasing lines and
> mechanical offset - a lot of the early AO10 and 13 ops went that way.
>
> We had M2 antennas at the AO27 ground station. They are very rugged,
> well made. However, the assembly method uses insulating plugs and
> push-nuts (so does my old Hy Gain sat array); they are a PITA to
> assemble and not meant for disassembly other than separating at boom
> joints. The 70cm antenna is rugged enough (and much smaller) for
> transport in sections, the longer 2M elements are succeptible to
> damage in a CP config. An option for 70cm is to use the bottom half
> of a longer boom CP antenna; I have been doing this with reasonable
> success on my home station.
>
> No experience with GA, so can't help there.
>
> FYI, Directive Systems changed owners approx a year or so ago and is
> now in Virginia. They were at Vienna and I expect they will be at
> Manassas and Berryville. A pair of 4 or 6 element 2M antennas (maybe
> their rover special) with phasing lines might make a good CP array.
> May be worth a call to them.
>
> 73
> Steve KS1G
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm(a)arrl.net
> <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > > Pat,
> >
> > I have only used linear antennas and I can say that I need to
> > constantly make adjustments to my polarity for the best signal. I
> > think I would find it very difficult to operate using a linear
> > yagi on
> > a tripod unless I had enough gain to overcome the polarization
> > fades.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Paul, N8HM
> >
> > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Pat Kilroy < pat(a)patkilroy.com
> > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > > Hi! Can anyone give me a recommendation for
> > > the RHCP antenna types for satellite work by
> > > the (new?) Gulf Alpha outfit?
> > >
> > > http://www.GulfAlphaAntennas.com/
> > > <http://www.GulfAlphaAntennas.com/>
> > >
> > > In particular, do you have first hand experience
> > > with the Gulf Alpha portable 2m 3x3 element RHCP
> > > on the 4ft boom and the 70cm 5x5 element RHCP on
> > > the 3ft boom? Or do you know someone who does?
> > >
> > > If I am so lucky, I would also appreciate if
> > > there are any comparisons of these types to
> > > the two "extremes" of competitors: M2 436CP30
> > > on the one hand and Arrow II (or the new
> > > Alaskan Arrow) antennas on the other.
> > >
> > > http://m2inc.com/index.php?ax=amateur&pg=106
> > > <http://m2inc.com/index.php?ax=amateur&pg=106>
> > > http://arrowantennas.com/arrowii/146-437.html
> > > <http://arrowantennas.com/arrowii/146-437.html>
> > >
> > > In my application of interest, I know the 436CP30
> > > is considered overkill because I am concerned about
> > > portable or semi-portable ground stations at the
> > > moment, but features such as construction technique
> > > and durability can be related among these units.
> > >
> > > As an aside, for those of you who use linear Yagi
> > > antennas for portable satellite work, how important
> > > is it for you to rotate the sense (polarization) of
> > > your antennas, vertical through horizontal, during
> > > a given contact? Not worth the bother? Or do you
> > > think "next time I'm gonna build in a way to rotate
> > > the plane of my uplink/downlink antenna"???
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much,
> > >
> > > Pat Kilroy
> > > N8PK
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > <http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-dc>
> > >
Hi! Can anyone give me a recommendation for
the RHCP antenna types for satellite work by
the (new?) Gulf Alpha outfit?
http://www.GulfAlphaAntennas.com/
In particular, do you have first hand experience
with the Gulf Alpha portable 2m 3x3 element RHCP
on the 4ft boom and the 70cm 5x5 element RHCP on
the 3ft boom? Or do you know someone who does?
If I am so lucky, I would also appreciate if
there are any comparisons of these types to
the two "extremes" of competitors: M2 436CP30
on the one hand and Arrow II (or the new
Alaskan Arrow) antennas on the other.
http://m2inc.com/index.php?ax=amateur&pg=106http://arrowantennas.com/arrowii/146-437.html
In my application of interest, I know the 436CP30
is considered overkill because I am concerned about
portable or semi-portable ground stations at the
moment, but features such as construction technique
and durability can be related among these units.
As an aside, for those of you who use linear Yagi
antennas for portable satellite work, how important
is it for you to rotate the sense (polarization) of
your antennas, vertical through horizontal, during
a given contact? Not worth the bother? Or do you
think "next time I'm gonna build in a way to rotate
the plane of my uplink/downlink antenna"???
Thoughts?
Thank you very much,
Pat Kilroy
N8PK
