Heading to the Desert RATS ham Fest tomorrow? If you want a new Arrow
II sat antenna with duplexer for twenty bucks off normal HRO price,
contact me ASAP. Only two available at this discount.
Clint, K6LCS
909-241-7666
Sent from my iPod.
On Jan 29, 2010, at 12:00, amsat-bb-request(a)amsat.org wrote:
> Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to
> amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> amsat-bb-request(a)amsat.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> amsat-bb-owner(a)amsat.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: A0-27 on Sat the 30th (Clint Bradford)
> 2. Re: A0-27 on Sat the 30th (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
> 3. FO-29 (David - KG4ZLB)
> 4. Re: Heard on FO-29 (i8cvs)
> 5. Re: FO-29 (w6zkh(a)comcast.net)
> 6. HO-68 Schedule - 01-07 Feb 2010 (Alan Kung)
> 7. Re: HO-68 Schedule - 01-07 Feb 2010 (Peter Scheller)
> 8. Re: HO-68 29-01 1320utc (Pedro A. Perez)
> 9. Re: [Mw] Satellite to carry Amateur Radio 5840.00
> MHztelemetry beacon (Stephen Hicks, N5AC)
> 10. DK7ZB 435MHz aerial question (Phil)
> 11. updated pseudo moon keps (Bob DeVarney W1ICW)
> 12. Re: DK7ZB 435MHz aerial question (Stan, W1LE)
> 13. ND9M Road Trip Update #3 (claryco(a)aol.com)
> 14. More great FO-29 passes (w6zkh(a)comcast.net)
> 15. UX-14 (Jim)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:14:28 -0800
> From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d(a)earthlink.net>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: A0-27 on Sat the 30th
> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
> Message-ID: <0CE3A982-FA46-4B8C-A7DE-33FD0BA78AF3(a)earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> PATRICK - ONE OF THE HARDEST WORKIN' AMSAT-TERS>> ... I will have a
> demonstration using the AO-27 satellite just after 2.00pm ...
>
> I am showing a pass at 1:01PM Pacific - is that the same pass,
> Patrick?
>
> I will be working it at the Desert RATS HamFest in Palm Springs.
>
> Clint, K6LCS
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:52:28 -0700
> From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb(a)wd9ewk.net>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: A0-27 on Sat the 30th
> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
> Message-ID:
> <2e18ad3e1001281552h28d4a6f6qf3d06bb31c180884(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Clint,
>
>> I am showing a pass at 1:01PM Pacific - is that the same pass,
>> Patrick?
>
> That will be the same pass. I think the software predicts the start
> of the 7-
> minute repeater time around 6 minutes past the hour, and I will be on
> as KM7CC.
>
>> I will be working it at the Desert RATS HamFest in Palm Springs.
>
> Hope to hear you on Saturday.
>
> 73!
>
>
>
>
>
> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
> http://www.wd9ewk.net/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:53:51 -0500
> From: David - KG4ZLB <kg4zlb(a)googlemail.com>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-29
> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
> Message-ID: <4B62319F.5080007(a)gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> So nice to hear FO-29 booming again on this last pass at 00:46, really
> strong and loud - congrats to the team on getting this one back in
> shape, very much appreciated!
>
> And hi to VE4EMU who obliged me with a contact although I lost you
> completely after the exchange!
>
> A couple of others on as well!
>
> --
> David
> KG4ZLB
> www.kg4zlb.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:07:27 +0100
> From: "i8cvs" <domenico.i8cvs(a)tin.it>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Heard on FO-29
> To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>, "Pierre van Deventer"
> <pierrevd(a)icon.co.za>, "Hal Lund ZS6WB"
> <zs6wb(a)telkomsa.net>, "Mineo
> Wakita" <ei7m-wkt(a)asahi-net.or.jp>
> Cc: fernandodibartolomeo(a)alice.it, I6IBE Ivo <brugneraivo(a)alice.it>,
> Marco Niccolini IW5EJM <m.niccolini(a)gmail.com>
> Message-ID: <007501caa07f$6cd0e280$0201a8c0(a)tin.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hal Lund ZS6WB" <zs6wb(a)telkomsa.net>
> To: "I8CVS Dom" <domenico.i8cvs(a)tin.it>
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:59 AM
> Subject: Heard on FO-29
>
>> Hello Dom
>>
>> I just wanted to let you know that I heard you calling this morning
>> on
>> FO-29 at 0615 utc. You were on CW on a downlink of about 435.840
>> MHz. You
>> were heard for several minutes and I copied your call distinctly
>> several
>> times.
>
>> You were probably transmitting on AO-7 at the time as AO-7 and
>> FO-29 were
>> very close together but AO-7 was just below a ridge to the west of
>> me and
>> I could not hear it directly at that time.
>
>> We could almost make it on AO-7 if my station wasn't sitting in a
>> bit of a
>> hole.
>>
>> It appears that FO-29 has been operational for several hours
>> continuously
>> now so that looks very promising.
>>
>> 73 - Hal ZS6WB
>>
>> Pretoria (KG44ee)
>>
>
> Hello Hal, ZS6WB and All on the List
>
> Tank you very much for the above important information and I will
> try to
> explain you what was really happening this night/morning on day 28 jan
> at 06:15 UTC
>
> Infact during orbit 61091 at 06:15 UTC I was transmitting to AO-07
> around
> 432.158 MHz searching to be translated exactly on 145.940 MHz at the
> exact
> moment in wich AO-7 was at the very LOS for me with less than 0.3?
> elevation
> on South at the end of the descending orbit 61091 from North to
> South when
> AO-7 was about over ZS-land in South Africa and despite a few hills
> 20 km
> away over my horizon I received back my CW succesfully up to 0.3?
> elevation.
>
> To determine my exact uplink frequency in order to be translated by
> AO-7 at
> 145.940 MHz +/- at the very AOS moment when the bird comes to me from
> South to North during an ascending orbit it was also very important
> for me
> this night because in the following days I plan to contact on
> skedule at
> 145.940 +/- MHz the friend ZS6BB, Pierre in KG43EU
>
> But what was really happening this night ? You are right !
>
> The distance into free space between AO-7 and FO-29 was about 1500
> km at
> 06:15 UTC and both satellites where in mutual covisibility so that my
> 145.940 MHz CW signal that was translated by AO-7 was received by
> FO-29
> and retranslated by FO-29 in 435.840 MHz at 06:15 UTC when you
> received
> my CW signal in Pretoria KG44EE through two satellites !
>
> In more details at 06.15 UTC the subsatellite point (SSP) of AO7
> was over
> Nigeria at 8.557? Latitude North and 10.095? Longitude Est and his
> footprint
> was not completely covering ZS land while the SSP of FO-29 was over
> Zaire
> at 6.482? Latitude South and Longitude 16.500? Est but his
> footprint was
> fully including ZS land where you was able to receive me in KG44EE
>
> The above demonstrates that when the footprints of two satellites
> about
> overlaps a two way QSO between two satellites is possible
> particularly on
> CW provided that the uplink and downlink frequency bands are the
> same and
> one station transmit to one satellite in 70 cm listening in 2 meters
> while
> the other one transmit to the other satellite in 2 meters listening
> in 70 cm
>
> Unfortunately this is not the case betwen AO-7 and FO-29 because the
> 70 cm
> bands are different 435.800 to 435.900 MHz for FO-29 and 432.125 to
> 432.175
> MHz for AO-7 so that only one way two satellite link is possible as
> you Hal
> experienced because the same 2 meters band is in common between both
> satellites.
>
> The above reception of my signal by you via FO-29 also demontrates
> that
> actually FO-29 is working very well after a very long QRT because it
> was
> so sensitive to receive my signal in 2 meters via AO-7 and
> retranslate it
> into 70 cm with sufficient power to be received by you in 70 cm in
> Pretoria
> South Africa
>
> By the way since you in KG44EE are very close to Pierre in KG43EU I am
> confident the at the end of testing and try with Pierre via AO-7 I
> can try a
> QSO via AO-7 as well with you and I will informe you about if you
> agree.
>
> The distance from my JN70ES and Pierre in KG43EU is 7548 km and with
> you in KG44EE is 7511 km both no bad distances from South Italy and
> South Africa via AO-7
>
> Best 73" de
>
> i8CVS Domenico
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:47:45 +0000 (UTC)
> From: w6zkh(a)comcast.net
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FO-29
> To: kg4zlb(a)gmail.com
> Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>
> Message-ID:
>
> <1461961093.1075411264733265894.
> JavaMail.root(a)sz0155a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Pass over central US was still in operation with several SSB
> stations on. I was on CW but no contacts. Pass was a 19 deg pass for
> me, and the 0408 utc pass will be 40 degs so hopefully more West
> Coast will be on...
>
> John W6ZKH
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David - KG4ZLB" <kg4zlb(a)googlemail.com>
> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:53:51 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada
> Pacific
> Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-29
>
> So nice to hear FO-29 booming again on this last pass at 00:46,
> really strong and loud - congrats to the team on getting this one
> back in shape, very much appreciated! And hi to VE4EMU who obliged
> me with a contact although I lost you completely after the exchange!
> A couple of others on as well! -- David KG4ZLB www.kg4zlb.com
> _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org
> . Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA
> member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:56:13 +0800
> From: "Alan Kung" <alankung(a)public3.bta.net.cn>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] HO-68 Schedule - 01-07 Feb 2010
> To: <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
> 31 Jan. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 19:20...Turn On
> South Africa, Europe, NA
> 20:05...Turn Off
>
> 23:05...Turn On
> South Africa,South America,Europe,
> NA,North Pole,North Asia
> 23:50...Turn Off
>
> 01 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 02:35...Turn On
> South Pole, South America,NA,North
> Asia,North Pole
> 03:20...Turn Off
>
> 11:40...Turn On
> Australia,New Zealand,South Asia,
> East Asia,North Asia,Europe
> 12:25...Turn Off
>
> 19:05...Turn On
> South Africa,Europe,NA,North Pole,North Asia
> 19:50...Turn Off
>
> 02 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 00:30...Turn On
> South America,NA,North Asia, North Pole
> 01:15...Turn Off
>
> 04:20...Turn On
> South America,NA,Middle Asia
> 05:05...Turn Off
>
> 15:15...Turn On
> Australia, India,South Asia,Europe,NA
> 16:00...Turn Off
>
> 18:45...Turn On
> Africa,Europe,NA
> 19:30...Turn Off
>
> 03 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 00:20...Turn On
> South America, NA,North Asia
> 01:05...Turn Off
>
> 03:45...Turn On
> South Pole,South America, NA
> North Asia, North Pole
> 04:30...Turn Off
>
> 13:10...Turn On
> Australia, South Asia, East Asia,North Asia
> 13:26...Turn Off
>
> 16:55...Turn On
> India,Middle East Asia,Europe,NA,
> 17:40...Turn Off
>
> 04 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 01:40...Turn On
> South Pole,South America,NA,North Asia
> 02:25...Turn Off
>
> 01:55...Turn On
> South America,NA,North Asia
> 02:40...Turn Off
>
> 03:45...Turn On
> South America,NA,North Asia
> 04:30...Turn Off
>
> 10:50...Turn On
> Oceania,South Asia,East Asia,North Asia
> 11:35...Turn Off
>
> 16:35...Turn On
> India,Middle Asia,Africa,Europe,NA
> 17:20...Turn Off
>
> 20:00...Turn On
> Africa,Europe,NA,North Asia
> 20:45...Turn Off
>
> 05 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 01:25...Turn On
> South America,NA,North Asia
> 02:10...Turn Off
>
> 03:15...Turn On
> South America,NA,North Asia
> 04:00...Turn Off
>
> 12:37...Turn On
> Oceania,South Asia, East Asia, North Asia
> 12:52...Turn Off
>
> 16:15...Turn On
> India,Middle Asia,Europe,NA
> 17:00...Turn Off
>
> 19:45...Turn On
> Africa,Europe,NA
> 20:30...Turn Off
>
> 06 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 01:10...Turn On
> South America,NA,North Asia
> 01:55...Turn Off
>
> 10:15...Turn On
> Oceania,East Asia,North Asia,Europe
> 11:00...Turn Off
>
> 16:00...Turn On
> India,Middle Asia,Europe,NA
> 16:45...Turn Off
>
> 19:25...Turn On
> Africa,Europe,NA,North Asia
> 20:10...Turn Off
>
> 07 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
> =======================================
> 00:50...Turn On
> South America,NA,North Asia
> 01:35...Turn Off
>
> 01:47...Turn On
> South Asia,East Asia, North Asia
> 02:02...Turn Off
>
>
> 73
> Alan Kung, BA1DU
> HO-68(XW-1) Project Manager
> www.camsat.cn
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:43:07 -1000
> From: Peter Scheller <nh6vb(a)msn.com>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO-68 Schedule - 01-07 Feb 2010
> To: <alankung(a)public3.bta.net.cn>, amsat-bb <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>
> Message-ID: <BAY141-W25F1B4551950FCE07DA111E15B0(a)phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Mr. Kung,
>
>
>
> It is heartbreaking to watch the HO-68 schedule, and see the
> satellite virtually cutting off
>
> seconds before the footprint reaches KH6 land. We are not asking to
> amend an existing and
>
> published schedule, but would be grateful for future considerations.
>
>
>
> Respectfully submitted
>
> Peter Scheller, NH6VB
>
>
>
>
>> From: alankung(a)public3.bta.net.cn
>> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
>> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:56:13 +0800
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] HO-68 Schedule - 01-07 Feb 2010
>>
>> 31 Jan. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 19:20...Turn On
>> South Africa, Europe, NA
>> 20:05...Turn Off
>>
>> 23:05...Turn On
>> South Africa,South America,Europe,
>> NA,North Pole,North Asia
>> 23:50...Turn Off
>>
>> 01 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 02:35...Turn On
>> South Pole, South America,NA,North
>> Asia,North Pole
>> 03:20...Turn Off
>>
>> 11:40...Turn On
>> Australia,New Zealand,South Asia,
>> East Asia,North Asia,Europe
>> 12:25...Turn Off
>>
>> 19:05...Turn On
>> South Africa,Europe,NA,North Pole,North Asia
>> 19:50...Turn Off
>>
>> 02 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 00:30...Turn On
>> South America,NA,North Asia, North Pole
>> 01:15...Turn Off
>>
>> 04:20...Turn On
>> South America,NA,Middle Asia
>> 05:05...Turn Off
>>
>> 15:15...Turn On
>> Australia, India,South Asia,Europe,NA
>> 16:00...Turn Off
>>
>> 18:45...Turn On
>> Africa,Europe,NA
>> 19:30...Turn Off
>>
>> 03 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 00:20...Turn On
>> South America, NA,North Asia
>> 01:05...Turn Off
>>
>> 03:45...Turn On
>> South Pole,South America, NA
>> North Asia, North Pole
>> 04:30...Turn Off
>>
>> 13:10...Turn On
>> Australia, South Asia, East Asia,North Asia
>> 13:26...Turn Off
>>
>> 16:55...Turn On
>> India,Middle East Asia,Europe,NA,
>> 17:40...Turn Off
>>
>> 04 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 01:40...Turn On
>> South Pole,South America,NA,North Asia
>> 02:25...Turn Off
>>
>> 01:55...Turn On
>> South America,NA,North Asia
>> 02:40...Turn Off
>>
>> 03:45...Turn On
>> South America,NA,North Asia
>> 04:30...Turn Off
>>
>> 10:50...Turn On
>> Oceania,South Asia,East Asia,North Asia
>> 11:35...Turn Off
>>
>> 16:35...Turn On
>> India,Middle Asia,Africa,Europe,NA
>> 17:20...Turn Off
>>
>> 20:00...Turn On
>> Africa,Europe,NA,North Asia
>> 20:45...Turn Off
>>
>> 05 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 01:25...Turn On
>> South America,NA,North Asia
>> 02:10...Turn Off
>>
>> 03:15...Turn On
>> South America,NA,North Asia
>> 04:00...Turn Off
>>
>> 12:37...Turn On
>> Oceania,South Asia, East Asia, North Asia
>> 12:52...Turn Off
>>
>> 16:15...Turn On
>> India,Middle Asia,Europe,NA
>> 17:00...Turn Off
>>
>> 19:45...Turn On
>> Africa,Europe,NA
>> 20:30...Turn Off
>>
>> 06 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 01:10...Turn On
>> South America,NA,North Asia
>> 01:55...Turn Off
>>
>> 10:15...Turn On
>> Oceania,East Asia,North Asia,Europe
>> 11:00...Turn Off
>>
>> 16:00...Turn On
>> India,Middle Asia,Europe,NA
>> 16:45...Turn Off
>>
>> 19:25...Turn On
>> Africa,Europe,NA,North Asia
>> 20:10...Turn Off
>>
>> 07 Feb. 2010, FM/Digital Transponder
>> =======================================
>> 00:50...Turn On
>> South America,NA,North Asia
>> 01:35...Turn Off
>>
>> 01:47...Turn On
>> South Asia,East Asia, North Asia
>> 02:02...Turn Off
>>
>>
>> 73
>> Alan Kung, BA1DU
>> HO-68(XW-1) Project Manager
>> www.camsat.cn
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
>> author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:44:09 +0100
> From: "Pedro A. Perez" <eb4dka(a)teleline.es>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO-68 29-01 1320utc
> To: <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Yep! I'll try to work from my mobile station from IM79.
>
> Pedro EB4DKA
> http://eb4dka.laserenadigital.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jp-byj-free" <jp.f6byj(a)free.fr>
> To: <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:10 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] HO-68 29-01 1320utc
>
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Ho-68 Linear Transponder
>> Tomorrow 1320UTC very good conditions for QSO NorthAmerica - Europe.
>>
>> S'73 Jep.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
>> author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:41:48 -0600
> From: "Stephen Hicks, N5AC" <n5ac(a)n5ac.com>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [Mw] Satellite to carry Amateur Radio 5840.00
> MHztelemetry beacon
> To: Graham Shirville <g.shirville(a)btinternet.com>
> Cc: microwave(a)lists.eclectechs.com, Amsat Reflector
> <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>, Stan <stan(a)capecod.com>
> Message-ID:
> <49b964731001281141s5a6745fbi7df880166cf3408e(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I'd be happy to program the additional frequency in the A32 if that
> would
> help. Let me know if you would like this done. generally, I add it
> to the
> software and then state what release it is in and then any after that
> release will always have that frequency.
>
> 73,
> Steve
>
>
> Sent from Austin, Texas, United States
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:10, Graham Shirville
> <g.shirville(a)btinternet.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Stan,
>>
>> The website http://www.unisec.jp/unitec-1/en/cooperation.html gives
>> quite
>> a lot of info as well...if you wish to make direct contact then you
>> can
>> email Naomi Kurahara<703kurahara(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Graham G3VZV
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stan" <stan(a)capecod.com>
>> To: "Trevor ." <m5aka(a)yahoo.co.uk>
>> Cc: <microwave(a)lists.eclectechs.com>; "Amsat Reflector" <
>> amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>; "Stephen Hicks, N5AC" <n5ac(a)n5ac.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:25 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [Mw] Satellite to carry Amateur Radio 5840.00
>> MHztelemetry beacon
>>
>>
>> This satellite holds some promise of a decent and doable microwave
>>> technical challenge.
>>>
>>> It will be possible to use our 5760 Transverters for a RX only
>>> application, maybe with minor tweaking.
>>>
>>> The LO is 5616 MHz, with the RF of 5840 MHz, the IF is 224 MHz,
>>> right in
>>> the US 222 MHz band.
>>>
>>> Maybe with a bigger dish, and a very low noise figure preamplifier,
>>> optimized at 5840 MHz,
>>> we could be in the UNITEC-1 deep space telemetry collection
>>> business.
>>>
>>> The DEMI A32 LO with an external 10 MHz reference, can add the
>>> frequency stability needed.
>>> Or maybe Steve, N5AC, can preprogramm the A32 for a 5,840-145=
>>> 5,695 / 5
>>> = 1,139.0 MHz
>>>
>>> A reasonable challenge this winter morning, as I sip my lukewarm
>>> tea at
>>> the dining room table.
>>>
>>> But more questions are raised:
>>>
>>> 1. Keplerian elements are great for satellites, but once UNITEC1
>>> enters
>>> deep space,
>>> what do we use to calculate and predict the path for our accurate
>>> tracking
>>> ?
>>>
>>> 2. Is there anything special about the modulation scheme ?
>>>
>>> Stan, W1LE Cape Cod FN41sr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Trevor . wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 20 Japan is planning to launch four "CubeSats". The
>>>> largest of
>>>> them, UNITEC-1, will carry a 15 watt Amateur Radio 5840.00 MHz
>>>> telemetry
>>>> beacon and travel into deep space towards Venus
>>>>
>>>> Three of the satellites will carry Amateur Radio payloads. On the
>>>> AMSAT
>>>> bulletin board Mineo Wakita JE9PEL writes
>>>>
>>>> Four CubeSats in Japan are planned to launch at 20 May 2010
>>>> together with PLANET-C which belongs to JAXA by H-IIA rocket.
>>>> http://www.jaxa.jp/index_e.html
>>>>
>>>> UNITEC-1, NPO UNISEC (University Space Engineering Consortium)
>>>> 5.8GHz
>>>> http://www.unisec.jp/unitec-1/en/top.html
>>>>
>>>> Negai*", Soka University
>>>> 437.305MHz CW, Packet 1200bps FSK AX.25
>>>> http://kuro.t.soka.ac.jp/main.html
>>>>
>>>> WASEDA-SAT2, Waseda University
>>>> 437.485 MHz CW(FM), PCM-FSK(FM) 9600bps
>>>> http://www.miyashita.mmech.waseda.ac.jp/Waseda-Sat2/index.htm
>>>>
>>>> KSAT, Kagoshima University
>>>> Uplink: S-band(2GHz, 10kbps), Downlink: Ku-band(13.275GHz, 10kbps/
>>>> 1Mbps)
>>>> http://www.sci.kagoshima-u.ac.jp/~nishio/download/Ukaren2008Nishio.pdf
>>>>
>>>> IARU Amateur Satellite Frequency Coordination information
>>>> Unitec-1 http://www.amsat.org.uk/iaru/finished_detail.asp?
>>>> serial=141
>>>> Negai http://www.amsat.org.uk/iaru/finished_detail.asp?serial=90
>>>> WASEDA-SAT2 http://www.amsat.org.uk/iaru/finished_detail.asp?serial=123
>>>>
>>>> AMSAT Bulletin Board AMSAT-BB
>>>> http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/tools/maillist/
>>>>
>>>> AMSAT-UK publish a colour A4 newsletter, OSCAR News, that is full
>>>> of
>>>> Amateur Satellite information.
>>>> Join online at https://secure.amsat.org.uk/subs_form/
>>>> ----
>>>> 73 Trevor M5AKA
>>>> Daily Amateur Radio News (Email/RSS): http://www.southgatearc.org/
>>>> Email Your News To: editor at southgatearc.org
>>>> Or Use Form at: http://www.southgatearc.org/news/your_news_1.htm
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Microwave mailing list
>>>> microwave(a)lists.valinet.com
>>>> http://www.valinet.com/mailman/listinfo/microwave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
>>> author.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:53:18 +1000
> From: Phil <phillor(a)telstra.com>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] DK7ZB 435MHz aerial question
> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
> Message-ID: <201001291653.18597.phillor(a)telstra.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Thank you for reading this.
>
> I'm in the process of setting up my satellite station after a five
> year break
> and my UHF aerial doesn't seem to be performing as well as I expect it
> should. I always suspected that it's performance was below par.
> AO-51, for
> instance, is received no better than strength 3 on my FT-847.
>
> The aerial is a twelve element design (twelve elements in each
> plane) by
> DK7ZB and is without a doubt the best 435MHz aerial that I have ever
> built.
> The extra twelve elements have been removed for testing purposes and
> is
> currently hand held and rotated as accurately as possible.
>
> I suspect that the poor gain might be due to the matching system
> because I
> was always unsure of the exact physical length of parallel quarter
> wave
> matching cable. The element lengths are spot on and the element
> spacing is
> within a millimetre of the design figures. The SWR, even after all
> this time,
> is still around 1.2:1. The Belden 9913 cable connecting the aerial
> to the
> radio is only nine metres long and, as best I can tell, has a about
> a half DB
> loss.
>
> I would like to make e-mail contact with anyone who may have built
> this
> aerial or one of the other UHF designs by DK7ZB.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Phil
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:49:36 -0500
> From: Bob DeVarney W1ICW <we1u(a)myfairpoint.net>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] updated pseudo moon keps
> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org, uni_Trac(a)topica.com
> Message-ID: <4B62E770.3020009(a)myfairpoint.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Here is a set of pseudo keps for the moon calculated using the
> MoonKeps
> program by HB9BNI ( thank you ! ) to calculate them, and then
> rewritten
> in two line form.
> These work fine for my Uni_Trac 2003 using both the -2003 and the
> -2000
> software.
> Perhaps they may help someone else with a stand-alone tracker like
> mine.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bob W1ICW
>
> MOON
> 1 00000U 00000A 10019.90529622 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 0004
> 2 00000 25.1631 348.5977 0637000 142.8591 221.8486 00.036600996 6
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:49:10 -0500
> From: "Stan, W1LE" <stanw1le(a)verizon.net>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: DK7ZB 435MHz aerial question
> To: Phil <phillor(a)telstra.com>
> Cc: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
> Message-ID: <4B62F566.6080903(a)verizon.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hello Phil,
>
> One big problem....
>
> ALL elements must be installed to effectively test.
> The V and H elements do interact, but that interaction is designed
> around by the designer.
>
> Add the other elements with matching system and retest.
>
> To prove this try modeling the entire element then remove all of the V
> or H elements.
>
> Stan, W1LE Cape Cod FN41sr
>
>
> Phil wrote:
>> Thank you for reading this.
>>
>> I'm in the process of setting up my satellite station after a five
>> year break
>> and my UHF aerial doesn't seem to be performing as well as I expect
>> it
>> should. I always suspected that it's performance was below par.
>> AO-51, for
>> instance, is received no better than strength 3 on my FT-847.
>>
>> The aerial is a twelve element design (twelve elements in each
>> plane) by
>> DK7ZB and is without a doubt the best 435MHz aerial that I have
>> ever built.
>> The extra twelve elements have been removed for testing purposes
>> and is
>> currently hand held and rotated as accurately as possible.
>>
>> I suspect that the poor gain might be due to the matching system
>> because I
>> was always unsure of the exact physical length of parallel quarter
>> wave
>> matching cable. The element lengths are spot on and the element
>> spacing is
>> within a millimetre of the design figures. The SWR, even after all
>> this time,
>> is still around 1.2:1. The Belden 9913 cable connecting the aerial
>> to the
>> radio is only nine metres long and, as best I can tell, has a about
>> a half DB
>> loss.
>>
>> I would like to make e-mail contact with anyone who may have built
>> this
>> aerial or one of the other UHF designs by DK7ZB.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:59:23 -0500
> From: claryco(a)aol.com
> Subject: [amsat-bb] ND9M Road Trip Update #3
> To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org
> Message-ID: <8CC6F1328B96CAF-59D0-D12E(a)webmail-m082.sysops.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
>
> Yesterday's snowfall in SW Kansas complicated road conditions and
> especially safety so I opted to hold off getting to the DM98/EM08
> line until today (Friday). I'll operate from that line during the
> AO27 pass that starts at about 29/1950Z. Depending on accessibiltiy,
> I may get to the quad grid point and add DM99/EM09.
>
>> From there, we'll head north to Nebraska and put out DM99/EM09
>> during the AO51 pass at 2236Z and then either put out the DN90/EN00
>> grid line or the DM99/EM09/DN90/EN09 quad field point on the AO51
>> pass starting at 30/0014Z.
>
> We have to focus on getting to Denver now, so time permitting,
> Saturday's game plan will be to hit the DN91/EN01 line on AO27 at
> 30/1922Z, stop again in DN91 for the second AO27 pass at 2101Z, and
> then the DN80/DN81 grid line on AO51 at 30/2335.
>
> After that, we'll be in Denver (DN70) and Cheyenne (DN71) with
> family for a few days before heading south through NM and into TX.
>
> 73 for now,
>
> Jim, ND9M / VQ9JC
> Wekeeney, KS / EM09
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:50:44 +0000 (UTC)
> From: w6zkh(a)comcast.net
> Subject: [amsat-bb] More great FO-29 passes
> To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>
> Message-ID:
>
> <1354380632.1292461264783844056.
> JavaMail.root(a)sz0155a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> It sure is nice to have FO-29 back online, after being off for
> awhile. The 0415 utc 2/29 pass provided my first QSO with VE4AMU and
> this last pass of 1602 utc provided a contact with Larry, WA6DIR.
> This last pass was out over the Pacific. (I missed the 1416 utc
> pass; was still in bed). I hope it stays active, but do know it is
> in a test phase.
>
> John W6ZKH
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:39:54 -0800
> From: "Jim" <hartwell(a)hartwell.net>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] UX-14
> To: <AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi all
>
> I am looking for a ICOM UX-14 interface board.
>
>
>
> TNX
>
> Jim
>
> K7UDG
>
> Hartwell(a)hartwell.net
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via amsat-bb(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 54
> ***************************************
It's booming down with 5 watts .
Orbit # 66.438
No trafic from North!!! .
Worked Hal ZS6WB loc(KG44ee)
2nd pass Orbit #66.439
Wk PE0SAT Jan and EA3NJ Juan.
Welcome Back My lovely Bird .
Thanks to JARL Commander Team
73'Nader
http://st2nh-blogger.blogspot.com/
It sure is nice to have FO-29 back online, after being off for awhile. The 0415 utc 2/29 pass provided my first QSO with VE4AMU and this last pass of 1602 utc provided a contact with Larry, WA6DIR. This last pass was out over the Pacific. (I missed the 1416 utc pass; was still in bed). I hope it stays active, but do know it is in a test phase.
John W6ZKH
Yesterday's snowfall in SW Kansas complicated road conditions and especially safety so I opted to hold off getting to the DM98/EM08 line until today (Friday). I'll operate from that line during the AO27 pass that starts at about 29/1950Z. Depending on accessibiltiy, I may get to the quad grid point and add DM99/EM09.
>From there, we'll head north to Nebraska and put out DM99/EM09 during the AO51 pass at 2236Z and then either put out the DN90/EN00 grid line or the DM99/EM09/DN90/EN09 quad field point on the AO51 pass starting at 30/0014Z.
We have to focus on getting to Denver now, so time permitting, Saturday's game plan will be to hit the DN91/EN01 line on AO27 at 30/1922Z, stop again in DN91 for the second AO27 pass at 2101Z, and then the DN80/DN81 grid line on AO51 at 30/2335.
After that, we'll be in Denver (DN70) and Cheyenne (DN71) with family for a few days before heading south through NM and into TX.
73 for now,
Jim, ND9M / VQ9JC
Wekeeney, KS / EM09
Thank you for reading this.
I'm in the process of setting up my satellite station after a five year break
and my UHF aerial doesn't seem to be performing as well as I expect it
should. I always suspected that it's performance was below par. AO-51, for
instance, is received no better than strength 3 on my FT-847.
The aerial is a twelve element design (twelve elements in each plane) by
DK7ZB and is without a doubt the best 435MHz aerial that I have ever built.
The extra twelve elements have been removed for testing purposes and is
currently hand held and rotated as accurately as possible.
I suspect that the poor gain might be due to the matching system because I
was always unsure of the exact physical length of parallel quarter wave
matching cable. The element lengths are spot on and the element spacing is
within a millimetre of the design figures. The SWR, even after all this time,
is still around 1.2:1. The Belden 9913 cable connecting the aerial to the
radio is only nine metres long and, as best I can tell, has a about a half DB
loss.
I would like to make e-mail contact with anyone who may have built this
aerial or one of the other UHF designs by DK7ZB.
--
Regards,
Phil
Here is a set of pseudo keps for the moon calculated using the MoonKeps
program by HB9BNI ( thank you ! ) to calculate them, and then rewritten
in two line form.
These work fine for my Uni_Trac 2003 using both the -2003 and the -2000
software.
Perhaps they may help someone else with a stand-alone tracker like mine.
Cheers,
Bob W1ICW
MOON
1 00000U 00000A 10019.90529622 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 0004
2 00000 25.1631 348.5977 0637000 142.8591 221.8486 00.036600996 6
So nice to hear FO-29 booming again on this last pass at 00:46, really
strong and loud - congrats to the team on getting this one back in
shape, very much appreciated!
And hi to VE4EMU who obliged me with a contact although I lost you
completely after the exchange!
A couple of others on as well!
--
David
KG4ZLB
www.kg4zlb.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal Lund ZS6WB" <zs6wb(a)telkomsa.net>
To: "I8CVS Dom" <domenico.i8cvs(a)tin.it>
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:59 AM
Subject: Heard on FO-29
> Hello Dom
>
> I just wanted to let you know that I heard you calling this morning on
> FO-29 at 0615 utc. You were on CW on a downlink of about 435.840 MHz. You
> were heard for several minutes and I copied your call distinctly several
> times.
> You were probably transmitting on AO-7 at the time as AO-7 and FO-29 were
> very close together but AO-7 was just below a ridge to the west of me and
> I could not hear it directly at that time.
> We could almost make it on AO-7 if my station wasn't sitting in a bit of a
> hole.
>
> It appears that FO-29 has been operational for several hours continuously
> now so that looks very promising.
>
> 73 - Hal ZS6WB
>
> Pretoria (KG44ee)
>
Hello Hal, ZS6WB and All on the List
Tank you very much for the above important information and I will try to
explain you what was really happening this night/morning on day 28 jan
at 06:15 UTC
Infact during orbit 61091 at 06:15 UTC I was transmitting to AO-07 around
432.158 MHz searching to be translated exactly on 145.940 MHz at the exact
moment in wich AO-7 was at the very LOS for me with less than 0.3° elevation
on South at the end of the descending orbit 61091 from North to South when
AO-7 was about over ZS-land in South Africa and despite a few hills 20 km
away over my horizon I received back my CW succesfully up to 0.3° elevation.
To determine my exact uplink frequency in order to be translated by AO-7 at
145.940 MHz +/- at the very AOS moment when the bird comes to me from
South to North during an ascending orbit it was also very important for me
this night because in the following days I plan to contact on skedule at
145.940 +/- MHz the friend ZS6BB, Pierre in KG43EU
But what was really happening this night ? You are right !
The distance into free space between AO-7 and FO-29 was about 1500 km at
06:15 UTC and both satellites where in mutual covisibility so that my
145.940 MHz CW signal that was translated by AO-7 was received by FO-29
and retranslated by FO-29 in 435.840 MHz at 06:15 UTC when you received
my CW signal in Pretoria KG44EE through two satellites !
In more details at 06.15 UTC the subsatellite point (SSP) of AO7 was over
Nigeria at 8.557° Latitude North and 10.095° Longitude Est and his footprint
was not completely covering ZS land while the SSP of FO-29 was over Zaire
at 6.482° Latitude South and Longitude 16.500° Est but his footprint was
fully including ZS land where you was able to receive me in KG44EE
The above demonstrates that when the footprints of two satellites about
overlaps a two way QSO between two satellites is possible particularly on
CW provided that the uplink and downlink frequency bands are the same and
one station transmit to one satellite in 70 cm listening in 2 meters while
the other one transmit to the other satellite in 2 meters listening in 70 cm
Unfortunately this is not the case betwen AO-7 and FO-29 because the 70 cm
bands are different 435.800 to 435.900 MHz for FO-29 and 432.125 to 432.175
MHz for AO-7 so that only one way two satellite link is possible as you Hal
experienced because the same 2 meters band is in common between both
satellites.
The above reception of my signal by you via FO-29 also demontrates that
actually FO-29 is working very well after a very long QRT because it was
so sensitive to receive my signal in 2 meters via AO-7 and retranslate it
into 70 cm with sufficient power to be received by you in 70 cm in Pretoria
South Africa
By the way since you in KG44EE are very close to Pierre in KG43EU I am
confident the at the end of testing and try with Pierre via AO-7 I can try a
QSO via AO-7 as well with you and I will informe you about if you agree.
The distance from my JN70ES and Pierre in KG43EU is 7548 km and with
you in KG44EE is 7511 km both no bad distances from South Italy and
South Africa via AO-7
Best 73" de
i8CVS Domenico
