February 2011 - AMSAT-BB - mailman.amsat.org

Re: AO-27 vs. TS-2000
by wa4hfn＠comcast.net 24 Feb '11

24 Feb '11

Ted I added a AR2 preamp at the antenna ,it did not stop the birdy but it allows me to hear through it{no duplex}.I cant hear my self until the signal passes the birdy but signals are there With the preamp when I transmitt It goes in bypass and the birdy wipes me out but in rx mode I can hear . WA4HFN Damon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted" <k7trkradio(a)charter.net> To: "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 9:39:18 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-27 vs. TS-2000 Looking for some advice, please Tried real hard to work AO27 on an 80 degree + pass this afternoon, using the TS 2000 in Sat Mode. No good results because of the 'birdies' inherent in the radio. (tried the narrow FM deal - no luck). As I look at Page 103 of the TS2000 manual I see that while using the main VFO at 436.799 that there is no rx possible. Since AO27's down link is at 436.795, it seems that the 'birdie issue' is on the 440 side of the TS-2000. So, what I thought I would try on those 80+degree passes over me, is to use a 2m/440 mobile rig on RX (with a dual band vertical realizing that the vertical is not optimum)l) and use the TS-2000 for Doppler TX. I can program the mobile like the Clint HT step Doppler deal. This is all temporary but I'm so sick of AO51, I would like to try for some new grids. Need about 30 for VUCC. Any TS2000 wizards out there would be appreciated 73, Ted K7TRK _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

1 0

ND9M/MM Ops: 24 Feb
by Clary, James T, Civilian 24 Feb '11

24 Feb '11

Today was very productive with three new wet grids being put into logs on five different satellites. Tomorrow should make at least two new grids (BM35 and BM45) available, and a third one (BM55) is possible. Here's where I expect to be QRV for tomorrow: AO7 - 24/1736Z AO27 - 24/2236Z (approx turn on time) FO29 - 25/0249Z VO52 - 25/0519 And these are the passes occurring during the business day that I'll make if time permits: VO52 - 24/1827Z AO27 - 25/0017Z (approx turn on time) AO51 - 25/0036Z FO29 - 25/0105Z AO51 - 25/0212Z 73, Jim, ND9M / VQ9JC Grid BM15

1 0

Elk 2M/440-L5 antenna
by Ted 24 Feb '11

24 Feb '11

Does anyone have a clean used unit that is for sale and able to be shipped to Oregon? Tnx, Ted K7TRK Pse contact off list at: k7trk(a)arrl.net or 541-282-2468 PayPal Preferred

1 0

Re: Considerate satellite operations behavior.
by Louis House, KD5GM 24 Feb '11

24 Feb '11

I agree totally! about 90% of my VO-52 passes have no one on the band. 52 is good and strong nearly all of the time, sometimes even as low as -2 degrees at aos/los. 72 louis kd5gm CW, the original digital > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:42:24 -0500 > From: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie(a)pa.net> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Considerate satellite operations behavior. > To: "John Geiger" <aa5jg(a)fidmail.com>, "i8cvs" > <domenico.i8cvs(a)tin.it>, "Amsat - BBs" <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org> > Message-ID: <36B1661D56DC4A6ABE981BDFE97306B5@billpc> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Just worked a pass of VO-52, only two signals heard calling CQ and I was > calling on CW. Plenty of room for more activity. > > 73 Bill K3SV > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Geiger" <aa5jg(a)fidmail.com> > To: "i8cvs" <domenico.i8cvs(a)tin.it>; "Amsat - BBs" <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>; > "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus(a)mcn.net> > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:28 PM > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Considerate satellite operations behavior. > > >> If you don't like the FM satellites, instead of complaining that we need >> more linear satellites (like I have seen suggested), HOW ABOUT USING THE >> ONES WE HAVE?? VO52 is an excellent satellite and it is hardly >> overcrowded, >> at least in the US. Many times there is only one or two stations on it. >> >> 73s John AA5JG

1 0

Tayrus-XL SCRUBBED - 24 Hours
by Clint Bradford 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

At about T MINUS 8 minutes to launch, NASA discovered they were not able to "see" a feedline/commandline to be able to shut things down in the final five minutes of countdown, so mission scrubbed for this morning, and, hopefully, will blast off tomorrow morning. Clint

1 0

ND9M/MM Ops - 24Feb11
by Clary, James T, Civilian 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

I should be QRV on the following passes tomorrow: AO7 - 24/0338Z (if in Mode B) AO51 - 24/0438Z (for JA) VO52 - 24/0504Z (very low elevation for me) SO50 - 24/0652Z I'll try to be on as many of the following passes as possible, but pse note that these occur during my work hours; sometimes I can easily get away, sometimes I can't. VO52 - 23/1810Z AO27 - 23/2304Z AO51 - 24/0114Z FO29 - 24/0159Z So far, I've had a lot of success with all satellites except SO50 which is hard for me to turn on. But I'll keep trying. We will cross into AM94 during the overnight hours, and hopefully I'll still be in that grid for the morning passes, assuming of course that I can get on at all. For the afternoon passes, I expect that we'll be in BM04 and maybe even get into BM14 by the end of the above list of passes. 73, Jim, ND9M / VQ9JC Grid AM84

1 0

Any Insomniacs? NASA TV 209AM PST
by Clint Bradford 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

Anyone else going to watch the Taurus XL launch from Vandenberg at 2:09 a.m. PST Wednesday? The launch vehicle will place the NASA spacecraft Glory into polar orbit and a secondary payload carrying educational small satellites for California Polytechnic State University. As well as the KySat-1 CubeSat. EchoLink AMSAT conference, perhaps? Anywhere else we might be able to meet? Clint, K6LCS

2 1

Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?
by John Heath 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

Just been looking at the tracking site http://www.n2yo.com/satellites Some great stuff on this site and thanks for posting the URL to the bb. At the bottom of the amateur radio satellite page there is a listing for OPS9328 (IDSCS 15) Were they ham satellites, I don't recal reading about them. Is this just a simple mistake in the listing? 73 john g7hia.

3 5

Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?
by Rocky Jones 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

Steve. thank you for your gentle corrections and you are "right". Should have remembered that better Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:19:45 -0600 From: melachri(a)verizon.net To: orbitjet(a)hotmail.com; g7hia(a)btinternet.com; amsat-bb(a)amsat.org Subject: Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967? Two corrections: 1. The satellites were actually built by Philco-Ford, which later became Ford Aerospace, and is now Space Systems/Loral.(TRW built the DSCS-2 series of satellites.) 2. Oscar IV was not launched with IDCSP. Oscar IV went up in December 1965, piggybacking on the booster that launched OV2-03, LES-3, and LES-4. The first IDCSP launch was not until June 1966. Steve MelachrinosW3HF On 02/22/11, Rocky Jones<orbitjet(a)hotmail.com> wrote: John. Initial defense satellite communications system...The first real communications system that the US military had. YOu can look on the web and get more information...but there is an amateur radio connection. The theory of the satellite constellation was that the satellites were dispersed about every 20 or so degrees in a "almost 24 hour" orbit which meant that they drifted across the sky, but slowly. This allowed multiple users by folks using different satellites and if one failed another was available. They were TRW satellites and the TRW amateur radio club got permission to launch a ham sat (Oscar IV) with one "batch" of satellites. Had IV got into the correct orbit it too would have "drifted" across the sky a few degrees every day. All the satellites were launched on a Titan III (a IIIC if memory serves) which had what was called "the transtage" which did the final orbit insertion and then deployed the satellites...in the case of IV the transtage failed and IV and a bunch of IDSCS's birds (and another test satellite) were left in an orbit that was highly elliptical and short lived. IV kind of looked like the IDSCS. Its great satellite history...the IDSCS satellites had a 7 year kill timer ( a chemical timer) but at least 6 of the kill timers had not worked. Robert G. Oler WB5MZO 5Nsomething and ARRL/AMSAT NARS member > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:58:42 +0000 > From: g7hia(a)btinternet.com > To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org > Subject: [amsat-bb] Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967? > > Just been looking at the tracking site http://www.n2yo.com/satellites > Some great stuff on this site and thanks for posting the URL to the bb. > > At the bottom of the amateur radio satellite page there is a listing for OPS9328 > (IDSCS 15) > > Were they ham satellites, I don't recal reading about them. > Is this just a simple mistake in the listing? > > 73 john g7hia. > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

1 0

Re: Considerate satellite operations behavior.
by Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

At 10:45 AM 2/21/2011 -0500, "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Okay, this one perplexes me--what in the world can the "powers to be at >amsat" do to fix this? Turn Off all the FM birds. ;-) No, we told them a dozen times already. Stop building FM crap, and do a HEO or at least as minimums, LEO's with linear transponders and Vuala! Problem solved. But no, they are committed to Fox now, which mean more whining. Anyone remember this degree of whining back when there was a HEO?

4 4