Let me summarize what I think was said in answer to my question; "Is
there any way to get a linear transponder on the ISS?"
1.) There is already a transponder on the ISS albeit an FM U/V one.
2.) It is not in use because it is either:
a.) a 'power hog' or
b.) it is not functioning properly or
c.) NASA does not want it functioning as an open repeater.
Amsat has the resources to fix a.) and b.)
but perhaps not c.) ( although we do have a liaison to NASA for such
things I believe.)
So the next question is; "Who at Amsat can talk to NASA about a solution?"
Tom K5VOU
> The nicest configuration... would be a 2m FM uplink with CTCSS to avoid
interference and a SSB 10m downlink.
The problem with that is the same as all our other FM satellites. Only a
single user at a time. Congestion, conflict and little practical value.
The better use of SSB is to use the same single channel FM bandwidth for a
wideband transponder allowing up to 30 or more simultaneous users. This
is equally trivial to do. Just connect the output of a 10m SSB receiver
tuned to 28.120 MHz to an FM downlink and use PSK-31 on the uplink. The
FM downlink gives everyone in the footprint the identical PSK waterfall
spectrum where they can tune all 30 QSO's simultaneously. Then each
person sets their PSK-31 uplink to an unused 100 Hz wide area in the
spectrum
Not only can 30 stations participate at once, the fact that they are
transmitting on 10m PSK31 and receiving on 2m or UHF FM at the same time
means they are also operating full duplex during the entire pass.
Everyone can talk to everyone without conflict or congestion.
And no special hardware is required for users. A PC with a sound card can
do it all.
Bob, WB4APR
hi amsaters, i will be going to the Wyoming State ham fest in buffalo in the northern part of the state,
dates will be june 6 and 7th, 2013 grid DN64 and could go down and over to other grids if requested,
i would like to setup sceds on any of the operational satellites, those stations needing the grids will be called,
and any one else that needs these grids is welcome also to give a shout,
other travelers have given me these grids in the past and i am returning the faver,
you know who you are thank you.
Rodney
kc0zhf DN71
Von: i8cvs [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2013 01:13
An: Andreas Imse
Betreff: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: International Space Station-Bounce on 1296 MHz
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
Hi Andreas, DJ5AR
Using the RADAR equation I would like to perform a link calculation of your
QSO with Jan PA3FXB through the International Space Station-Bounce on 1296
MHz
I already know that the gain of your 3 meter dish is 29 dB and your power at
the feed point is 200 W but I need the additional estimated following
informations:
1) The range and the elevation from the ISS and your QTH as soon you started
receiving your own ECHO'es signals.
2) The maximum range and the elevation from the ISS and your QTH when your
received signals were the strongest possible.
3) Were you receiving in analogic CW using 500 Hz filter and headphone or
were you using digital WSJT software such as FSK441 or others software
(commonly used for rapidly moving meteor scatter QSO's). ?
When the ISS is at the AOS with elevation of 2 degrees the range is about
2000 km and when the elevation is about 35 degrees the range is about 700 km
so that I plan to calculate the budged link for a range 700 km and see what
the results are in Signal to Noise ratio using only a analogic CW receiver
and
than calculate the advantages using a digital system.
Thanks for your answere.
73" de i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message -----
From: Andreas Imse
To: domenico.i8cvs(a)tin.it
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: International Space Station-Bounce on 1296 MHz
Hi Domenico,
I saw your posting and will give you a short reply.
We are both using 3 m dishes, 200 W here and 375 W on Jan´s side.
That was far enough for our tests.
As our QTHs are quite close (only 367 km), it is possible that QSOs over a
larger distances might be possible with less power like in aircraft scatter.
If you are equipped for 1296 MHz and able to track the ISS with your
antenna, we should have a try.
Doppler compensation can be done completely on my side.
vy 73,
Andreas
DJ5AR / EI8HH
dj5ar(a)darc.de
www.dj5ar.de
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Imse" <andreas(a)imse.de>
To: <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:20 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: International Space Station-Bounce on 1296 MHz
Hi Domenico and all others, interested in this subj
I am not looking for completing QSOs only and would like to test with
receiving stations too.
if you have an antenna for 1296 MHz and are able to do ISS tracking, we can
try.
I can perform the complete doppler compensation as well for uplink as for
downlink here.
So the receiving station may stay and listen on a fixed frequency ( e.g.
1296,300 MHz).
vy 73,
Andreas
DJ5AR / EI8HH
mailto:[email protected]> dj5ar(a)darc.de
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Andreas, DJ5AR / EI8HH
Using the data of your station and that of Jan PA3FXB I was
able to compute the Link Budged calculations for the international
Space Station-Bounce on 1296 MHz
LINK BUDGED CALCULATIONS by i8CVS
We consider the ISS like a passive reflector with reflectivity
factor of 10 % to try a QSO by reflection Earth-ISS-Earth
DATA:
1) The solar panels of the ISS plus the central body large like a
Boeing 747 have a metallic reflecting surface of about
2000 square meters and we consider the ISS like a circular
RADAR target having being a metallic plate an estimated
reflectivity factor S of 10 % at SHF
2) The range EARTH-ISS at elevation of 35 degrees is about
700 km
3) Our EME station at 1296 MHz uses a 3 meters dish in diameter
with gain of 29 dB and 200 W at the feed
4) The overall noise figure of our receive system is NF = 0.5 dB
while the antenna temperature is 50 kelvin when pointed at the
Cold Sky and we receive on CW using a filter with a BW large
500 Hz
5) We use only analogic reception without digital software like
WSJT or similar tecniques.
CALCULATION PROCEDURE :
Aiming the dish towards the ISS when distant 700 km and
transmitting on CW and using the RADAR equation we
calculate the Signal to Noise ratio S/N to see if on CW the
echoes reflected by the ISS are above or belove the Noise
Floor of receiver.
First of all using the RADAR equation we calculate the round
trip attenuation in dB between EARTH-ISS-EARTH when
approaching to TCA the average range is 700 km
RADAR EQUATION
Pt x Gt x Ar x S
Pr = -----------------------------
( 4 x 3.14 x R^2 ) ^2
Where :
Pr = power received in watt
Pt = power transmitted = 1 watt
Gt = isotropic gain of a ground antenna at 1296 MHz = 1 time
in power or 0 dB
Ar = aperture area of isotropic antenna at 1296 MHz = 0,0043
square meters
S = Sigma or Radar Cross Section i.e. the surface of the ISS in
square meters with reflecting coefficient of 0.10 = 10 %
R = distance or range EARTH-ISS = 700 km = 700000 meters
NOTE:
(4 x 3.14 x R^2)^2 calculates the surface of a sphere having a
radius R=700000 meters elevated time 2 to take account of the
round trip "EARTH-ISS-EARTH"
CALCULATION OF ATTENUATION "EARTH-ISS-EARTH"
:
S = Sigma of the ISS with reflecting surface of 2000 square meters
and reflection coefficient of 10 % = 2000 x 0.10 = 200 square meters
Calculation of the aperture area Ar of isotropic antenna at 1296 MHz
/ 2 2
/\ 0,2314
Ar = ---------- = ----------- = 0,0043 square meters
4 x 3,14 4 x 3,14
Calculation of the received power Pr on the EARTH
collected by the isotropic antenna at 1296 MHz
1 x 1 x 0.0043 x 200 -26
Pr = --------------------------------- = 2.27 x 10 watt
(4 x 3.14 x 700000^2 )^2
Calculation of the attenuation Att for the Round-Trip
EARTH-ISS-EARTH
Pt (1watt)
25
Att = --------------------- = 4.41 x 10 time in power
-26
2.27 x 10 watt
25
and in dB the Att = 10 log 4.41 x 10 = 256.4 dB
10
CALCULATION OF THE OVERALL NOISE FLOOR
FOR THE RECEIVER :
Data of the 1296 MHz receiving system :
Overall Noise Figure of receiving system NF= 0.5 dB = 35 kelvin
Bandwidth BW of receiver on CW = 500 Hz
Equivalent Noise Temperature Ta of the antenna when aimed toward
the Cold Sky = 50 kelvin
Calculation to get the Noise Floor KTB of receiver
Where :
-23
K = Boltzmann constant = 1,38 x 10 joule/kelvin
T = Equivalent noise temperature Ta of the antenna plus the
equivalent Noise Temperature Te of receiver i.e. T= (Ta + Te)
Computation of the overall Noise Factor F for the receiver
F = 10 ^ (NF/10) and so F = 10 ^(0,5 / 10) = 10 ^0,05 = 1,12
in factor
The equivalent overall Noise Temperature Te of the receiver is
Te = ( F-1) x 290 = (1,12 -1) x 290 = 35 kelvin
The overall Noise Floor KTB of the receiving system with the
antenna connected is :
KTB = K x ( Te + Ta ) x BW and in numbars :
-23
Noise Floor KTB = 1,38 x 10 x ( 35 + 50 ) x 500 = -182.3 dBW
LINK CALCULATION "round trip" EARTH -ISS-EARTH at 1296 MHz
on CW
TX power at feed.................................+23 dBW = 200 watt
Antenna Gain in TX................. ...........+29 dBi
------------
EIRP transmitted to the ISS. ..............+52 dBW = 158.5 kW
Attenuation EARTH-ISS-EARTH... - 256.4 dB
-------------
Power Pr received on EARTH over
isotropic antenna ............................ - 204.4 dBW
Antenna Gain in RX......................... + 29 dB
------------
Power incident at receiver input ...... - 175.4 dBW
RX Noise Floor......................... ........- 182.3 dBW
------------
S/N ratio CW at RX audio output... + 6.9 dB
CONCLUSION :
At a range of 700 km from the ISS and using a 3 meters dish with
200 W at the feed and a receiving system with a Noise Floor of
-183.3 dBW = - 153.3 dBm it is possible to hear your hown echo
signals in plain analogic CW with a Signal to Noise ratio S/N of
+6.9 dB wich is very strong.
If two stations are equipped with the same equipments it is
possible to make good QSO for a short time when the ISS
is close range around 700 km at elevation of about 35
degrees.
Increasing the BW of receiver at 2700 Hz to try receive SSB
it is very difficult since the signal reflected back by the ISS
will be very noisy with a S/N ratio of about - 0.5 dB and so
belove the Noise Floor of your receiver.
It is necessary to use a precise traking system particularly fast
to move the dish as soon the ISS approach the TCA because
the beam wide of a 3 meter dish with gain of 29 dB is large
only about 5 degrees at the -3 dB points so that traking the
ISS at 1296 MHz with a 3 meter dish or even larger for EME
it seems to be the more critical point.
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
Hi Domenico and all others, interested in this subject.
I am not looking for completing QSOs only and would like to test with
receiving stations too.
if you have an antenna for 1296 MHz and are able to do ISS tracking, we can
try.
I can perform the complete doppler compensation as well for uplink as for
downlink here.
So the receiving station may stay and listen on a fixed frequency ( e.g.
1296,300 MHz).
vy 73,
Andreas
Andreas Imse
DJ5AR / EI8HH
Hinter der Kirche 31
55129 Mainz
Germany
+49 6136 959025
<mailto:[email protected]> dj5ar(a)darc.de
<http://www.dj5ar.de> www.dj5ar.de
Hi Domenico,
your plan is really interesting, but I cannot support you with exact data at
present.
Maybe the wav file recorded by my SDR can give you an impression of the QSO:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8ak4za2va9ZVld5ZXZaREE5bXc/edit?usp=sharing
I did not receive own echoes off the ISS, just the ones of PA3FXB, who was
using a 3 m dish as well and 375 W at feed. We used plain CW and I heard Jan
on my speaker with 2700 Hz Bandwidth.
As it was the very first shot, just to complete a QSO, no semi scientific
records were made, hi. There were too many other things to mention about.
But it is a good idea to record all data as current elevation, azimuth,
slant range, relative speed and doppler to a file. Since I do the complete
station control including CW transmission by a homebrew program,
it is just a small piece of work to do, to realize that. These data could
easily be synchronized with a wav file, like the one linked above, by using
the switching between RX and TX.
Jan and I plan further tests, when ISS will appear again at more moderate
times ;-)
We are thinking about FSK441 tests too, but not at present.
vy 73,
Andreas
Andreas Imse
DJ5AR / EI8HH
Hinter der Kirche 31
55129 Mainz
Germany
+49 6136 959025
dj5ar(a)darc.de
www.dj5ar.de
Von: i8cvs [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2013 01:13
An: Andreas Imse
Betreff: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: International Space Station-Bounce on 1296 MHz
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
Hi Andreas, DJ5AR
Using the RADAR equation I would like to perform a link calculation of your
QSO with Jan PA3FXB through the International Space Station-Bounce on 1296
MHz
I already know that the gain of your 3 meter dish is 29 dB and your power at
the feed point is 200 W but I need the additional estimated following
informations:
1) The range and the elevation from the ISS and your QTH as soon you started
receiving your own ECHO'es
signals.
2) The maximum range and the elevation from the ISS and your QTH when your
received signals were the
strongest possible.
3) Were you receiving in analogic CW using 500 Hz filter and headphone or
were you using digital WSJT software
such as FSK441 or others software (commonly used for rapidly moving
meteor scatter QSO's). ?
When the ISS is at the AOS with elevation of 2 degrees the range is about
2000 km and when the elevation is about 35 degrees the range is about 700 km
so that I plan to calculate the budged link for both distances 2000 km and
700 km and see what the results are in Signal to Noise ratio using only a
analogic CW receiver and than calculate the advantages using a digital
system.
Thanks for your answere.
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message -----
From: Andreas Imse <mailto:[email protected]>
To: domenico.i8cvs(a)tin.it
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: International Space Station-Bounce on 1296 MHz
Hi Domenico,
I saw your posting and will give you a short reply.
We are both using 3 m dishes, 200 W here and 375 W on Jan´s side.
That was far enough for our tests.
As our QTHs are quite close (only 367 km), it is possible that QSOs over a
larger distances might be possible with less power like in aircraft scatter.
If you are equipped for 1296 MHz and able to track the ISS with your
antenna, we should have a try.
Doppler compensation can be done completely on my side.
By the way: I have been visiting Naples and Stromboli 3 years ago and
remember passing Torre del Greco with the Circum Vesuviana.
vy 73,
Andreas
Andreas Imse
DJ5AR / EI8HH
Hinter der Kirche 31
55129 Mainz
Germany
+49 6136 959025
dj5ar(a)darc.de
www.dj5ar.de
I've continued to try to troubleshoot the problem with no success. I
checked and the DopplerSQF file appears to be entact. Read the manual
and searched the FAQ but can't find any reason why I'd be "missing" the
data in the CAT field.
If I select an alternative configuration, the program seems to work
fine, but that causes me to lose my settings and have to begin
all over again.
Any ideas?
--
--
73,
Les Rayburn, N1LF
121 Mayfair Park
Maylene, AL 35114
EM63nf
6M VUCC #1712
AMSAT #38965
Grid Bandits #222
Southeastern VHF Society
Central States VHF Society Life Member
Six Club #2484
Active on 6 Meters thru 1296, 10GHz & Light